SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV BETA Release Products > SageTV Beta Test Software
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Beta Test Software Discussion related to BETA Releases of the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. regarding SageTV Beta Releases should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2004, 12:47 PM
MonocularJack MonocularJack is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 8
How do the new 2.2 decoders fare?

How do the new decoders in 2.2 stack up against Intervideo/nVidia/Sonic? Are we thinking this was just a distribution issue to remove dependences or are they viable contenders? I'm currently cable-deep in testing MCE 2005 so I don't have a box to try out the new beta on to see for myself.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:01 PM
mlbdude's Avatar
mlbdude mlbdude is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 4,174
They are pretty good but they do not support DXVA (hardware acceleration). This is generally what most users run. They include the decoders mainly for ease of setup, however, if you do not run DXVA (ffdshow/DScaler users) they are definitely usable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:03 PM
mikejaner's Avatar
mikejaner mikejaner is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chantilly VA
Posts: 2,087
Send a message via MSN to mikejaner
The Nvidia and Sonic Drivers still have the best picture. But the Sage ones are free like the ones which come with the Hauppauge cards, so you can't argue with that.
__________________
Mike Janer
SageTV HD300 Extender X2
Sage Server: AMD X4 620,2048MB RAM,SageTV 7.x ,2X HDHR Primes, 2x HDHomerun(original). 80GB OS Drive, Video Drives: Local 2TB Drive GB RAID5
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2004, 01:48 PM
GbrNole GbrNole is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 844
the dscaler5 ones are free too and slap all but the nvidia codecs about the side of the head and if your pc is weak and you want to use ffdshow then they are efficient enough to allow higher settings than you get from nvidia.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2004, 09:28 PM
kny3twalker kny3twalker is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,074
are you sure these decoders do not support DXVA
I asked over at Dscaler if their decoders were supporting DXVA and they said no
but this was untrue
Dscaler 5 supports DXVA so how can you be so sure that these do not

and they are better than the decoders included with the hauppauge card but that about it
Dscaler 5 is a better free option
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2004, 10:44 PM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
No, they don't support DXVA. IMO, they are very good, I still prefer nVidia's newest, but they are definitely competent.

kny,

How did you come to the conclusion that Dscaler 5 supports DXVA? AFAIK, there's no way to enable it, and John (the author) stated that he hadn't implimented DXVA support.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-10-2004, 11:41 PM
kny3twalker kny3twalker is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,074
from using radlight
by default IDCT is acclerated
and I got the same skipping when fast fowarding in SageTV
if I changed this from accelerated to reference then the skipping went away

I am pretty sure IDCT acceleration is part of DXVA/hardware acceleration

also I am not completely sure the fast foward bug has gone away completely
I am still using NvVPP though
it seems to be giving the best playback and close to the best image
with pixel adaptive I do get some frame drops
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2004, 04:14 PM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by kny3twalker
by default IDCT is acclerated
I'm 99.99% sure that's not DXVA, it's either SSE/SSE2/3Dnow accellerated, or just an optomized method.

For example (radeon 9500 - Athlon XP 1800)
Dscaler 5 "Accellerated" I get about 30% CPU
Dscaler 5 "Reference" - 30% CPU (might be a little less, like 25-27%) - this actually surprised me
Dscaler 5 "MMX Only" - 25% CPU
nVidia DXVA - 12% CPU
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2004, 11:39 PM
heffe2001's Avatar
heffe2001 heffe2001 is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Conover, NC
Posts: 1,269
If you use a hex editor, you can see who makes the drivers they are using... Copyright tag in the files say it's MainConcept. So if Mainconcept's decoder uses DXVA, I'm gonna guess the included ones do too...

BUT I've not tried it to be sure...
__________________
Server: AMD Phenom 2 920 2.8ghz Quad, 16gb Ram, 4tb Storage, 1xHVR-2250, 1 Ceton Cable Card adapter, Windows 7 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2004, 12:47 AM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by heffe2001
If you use a hex editor
All you have to do is open the config pannel (via graphedit or Radlight) to see who they're from
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-13-2004, 10:17 PM
coppit coppit is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 176
I was unimpressed compared to the Hauppage NonCSS decoders. The SciFi logo had serious jaggies with this decoder
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.