|
General Discussion General discussion about SageTV and related companies, products, and technologies. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Do Connected TVs make sense?
While it would be nice to have Netflix, etc. on your TV without the need for an external device/box I have no interest in TVs with this functionality. The technology for these sorts of devices changes too quickly - more quickly than I am prepared to buy a new TV and I buy a lot of TVs (I have five HDTVs).
Look at Sage extenders - the life of an average generation for them is less than 18 months as we are on the third generation extender - the HD 100 came out in Dec 2007, less than 37 months ago.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
To me, any proprietary standard item that performs a single task, is limited in usefulness. My personal preference is a software solution that can perform all the tasks I want, and be distributable to any device I want.
Hence my love for Sage and PC clients lol. Grant |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I know what you are saying but if those single purpose devices are cheap enough and save lots of hassles then they make sense.
Hence my love of Sage extenders which keep going down in price, especially for us Canucks!
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
For me, "connected TVs" don't particularly add any value but then I suspect that most SageTV users are very different from the average TV buyer.
A separate computer to do all the "connected" stuff works better in my opinion as I have more control, more options. Even if you don't want to run a computer I still think a TV is really nothing more than a big monitor (has been in my house for years at least) and the "connected" functions are better put in a small, much cheaper and easier to upgrade box. But then the reality so far has been I do the connected stuff on the computers, and the video watching on the TV and haven't mixed the 2 much. Once in a while I'll copy a YouTube clip over to the video server so my wife can watch it but that's about it. Or download an episode Sage missed for some reason. But even then it's download from the computer, watch on the TV so really I don't mix the 2 much. Eric |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I wouldn't say that the lifetime of a Sage Media Extender is only 18 months. There's no reason why the older ones won't work. I still use 2 MVPs and 1 HD200 and I expect to use them for quite a while.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Even though I dont use the Sage extenders, I dont consider them a single-purpose device. The software (albeit on a server) is upgradeable, they can be flash firmware upgraded, and they seem to push a lot of media types through them. Almost bought one for the bedroom, but after looking at the Socket 1156 Gigabyte miniITX mobo, I think I'll just swap out the ION board in my "homemade" extender and go back to a fan-based system.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
The connected TVs are upgradable also. You're not stuck with what you buy. They can add/modify features.
Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr _______ Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Correct.
Though it'll be interesting to see which of the manufacturers really come out with frequent and meaningful firmware upgrades. My bet is that they'll quietly let the TVs become obsolete and not bother much. I suspect not many TV buyers are familiar with firmware upgrades, so won't put much pressure on TV manufacturers. Maybe that will change slowly as people get used to connected TVs. As a geek it'd be fun to have a homebrew firmware running my TV... but it's a scary proposition if you brick it! Eric |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
You can upgrade an HD-100 to run Sage7 but I would still prefer an HD-300.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I think they make sense. Especially as a SageTV user I would love a way to bring Netflix, Vudu, Hulu Plus, etc., to the TV without another box.
B
__________________
Running SageTV on unRAID via Docker Tuning handled by HDHR3-6CC-3X2 using OpenDCT |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Yes. It does make sense although it's a small value add really.
Even better would be a TV with SageTV HTPC extender built in. Oh and throw in an actual way to tune all channels provided by the Cable, Satellite, and OTA sources without some other box.... I can dream can't I?!? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Why would you need that if you had everthing else? Why watch LiveTV if you have all of these other sources plus a Sage server that can access all channels? LiveTV would be kind of unnecessary in such a configuration.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Eric |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Secondly it's not about need. It's about want Finally, if I can have all of that, I want the TV to have an expandable SSD storage slot and the server to be built in. Like I said.... dream. Quote:
Last edited by Brent; 01-07-2011 at 04:18 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
For our household a connected tv is useless as we don't have a tv. We use display panels so have 1 hdmi and 1 vga input only. I was surprised to find it had speakers. It also means I don't need to buy yet another box now DVB-T2 is being broadcast, just a tuner card. Until the online services become fully integrated and seamless, eg selecting something in the EPG pulls it from iPlayer, ITV Player, 4OD etc if we missed it it doesn't give us anything over using the PS3 which provides much better quality than the PCs in the house. Our PS3 performs iPlayer, Lovefilm, BlinkBox duties but to be honest we hardly use it. If someone could explain why YouTube is used as a standard bearer for streaming video services I'd love to know. I've never found anything that makes YouTube streaming a good thing to have. More importantly until our broadband connection is faster we'll keep getting pauses and can forget HD feeds. We don't have transfer caps to worry about like many people thankfully. For many UK households their broadband connections have low usage limits and low speeds. It won't take long for all these connected devices take them over their monthly caps at which point they'll either get no internet, very very slow internet or a large bill. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Sounds more like a nightmare to me. Why would I want three kinds of tuner, storage, servers, and who knows what else built into my display device? And replicated in every display device in the house? And have to trade in the whole shebang and start over from scratch every time I upgrade the display? All that stuff belongs in a closet somewhere out of sight where it can keep on ticking as I swap out various components (including displays). I don't want the manufacturer trying to miniaturize my AV rack in order to shoehorn it into the back of the TV.
__________________
-- Greg |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Greg. Why do you have to bring me back to reality? Why!
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
This is all available at the five extenders in my house plus any PC via PS or by just playing the video files in a video player like WMP. Plus it is also very easily copied to a portable hard drive to play on a laptop or netbook. My kids don't understand the concept of live TV.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I record all of the local basketball and hockey games and watch them in near real-time (the night of the game) and gain many hours in my life. It only takes me 60 minutes to watch a hockey game, not 2.5 hours. And you can watch NFL games in less than 30 minutes - the problem is the live updates of other games if you care about simultaneous games.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Back in the days before set top boxes ruled the world (20 years ago), internet connected TV would have made a lot of sense (of course there was no internet content 20 years ago)...
The problem is that now that everything is digital and DRM'd most TV watchers need a STB from their Cable or Satellite provider. The TV gets set to an HDMI or component input or tuned to channel 3 and all the tuning is done via the STB. I would guess that most people just use the univeral remote provided with the STB to turn on their TV and cable box, adjust the volume and change channels. That universal remote most likely cannot even access these new internet widgets. STB's have really been bad for a lot of nice TV features (Picture-in-Picture is pretty much useless unless you want to hook-up two STB's to a single TV). This is where a better next-gen cable card solution (like the proposed residential gateway) would make a big difference. If everything was decrypted when it first entered your house so that your TV's no longer required set-top boxes, you could actually use the fancy remote that comes with your TV and take advantage of features like these internet widgets and PIP.
__________________
Server: Ryzen 2400G with integrated graphics, ASRock X470 Taichi Motherboard, HDMI output to Vizio 1080p LCD, Win10-64Bit (Professional), 16GB RAM Capture Devices (7 tuners): Colossus (x1), HDHR Prime (x2),USBUIRT (multi-zone) Source: Comcast/Xfinity X1 Cable Primary Client: Server Other Clients: (1) HD200, (1) HD300 Retired Equipment: MediaMVP, PVR150 (x2), PVR150MCE, HDHR, HVR-2250, HD-PVR |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Public Service Announcement: WHS gives a false sense of security for Sage purposes | btrcp2000 | General Discussion | 23 | 10-02-2010 06:59 AM |
Are my TVs too old for digital cable? | jal | Hardware Support | 5 | 08-29-2010 07:02 PM |
One computer, two TVs | vj1 | Hardware Support | 8 | 01-14-2009 12:32 PM |
Does this hardware make sense for my SageTV rebuild? | CanadianEh | Hardware Support | 7 | 01-06-2007 10:32 AM |
Are tvs truely 16x9 or 4:3? | broderp | General Discussion | 25 | 09-07-2004 08:15 PM |