SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV Products > SageTV Media Extender
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Media Extender Discussion related to any SageTV Media Extender used directly by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to a SageTV supported media extender should be posted here. Use the SageTV HD Theater - Media Player forum for issues related to using an HD Theater while not connected to a SageTV server.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2009, 10:34 AM
SageGk SageGk is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Motion blur

I'm having a problem with my extender setup. What I thought was a stutter, seems to be more like a "motion blur" to me now. I notice this when watching HD-PVR material on my HD200. Funny thing is, I have a samsung DLP and I thought DLP's didn't suffer from motion blur. I have the HD200 locked at 1080i connected via HDMI to a Sony DG-920 AVR. Anyone care to take a stab at it?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-01-2009, 06:27 AM
ChuckSchick ChuckSchick is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
You might see if you experience the same "motion blur" at 720p.

720p is going to be better for anything "motiony"

random google hit on the subject: http://ezinearticles.com/?Eye-Candy?...80p?&id=123148
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-01-2009, 09:51 PM
SageGk SageGk is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
I may go to 720p, but you think it'll sacrifice PQ with the HD-PVR?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:44 AM
TechJunkie TechJunkie is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA, Southern California
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by SageGk View Post
I may go to 720p, but you think it'll sacrifice PQ with the HD-PVR?
SageGk,

All HD braodcast are 720p or lower. There are a lot of advantages setting your STB to output 720p. You will not loose any picture quality since the STB will have to upscale if you have it output anything higher then 720p. Sage HD will do the Upscaling for you.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:34 AM
reggie14 reggie14 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechJunkie View Post
All HD braodcast are 720p or lower. There are a lot of advantages setting your STB to output 720p. You will not loose any picture quality since the STB will have to upscale if you have it output anything higher then 720p. Sage HD will do the Upscaling for you.
I'm confused by this post. Several networks broadcast in 1080i. Are you claiming 720p is "higher" than 1080i?

SageGk-

Have you tried setting your HD200 to do native resolution switching, so it will switch to the resolution of the current video file? I have absolutely no idea if that would help. I'm just saying that because I would think (perhaps incorrectly) that most nice TVs would have better upscalers than the extenders.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2009, 11:12 AM
SageGk SageGk is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
I hate native switching because it takes quite a few seconds to change resolutions when changing channels. I'm going to lock the box at 720 and see what happens.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2009, 12:35 PM
ChuckSchick ChuckSchick is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by reggie14 View Post
...Are you claiming 720p is "higher" than 1080i?
If by "higher" you mean "of better quality" I think the debate is still ongoing. Google "720p versus 1080i" and you can join the conversation on any number of forums. The main argument seems to me to boil down to some saying that 1080i would more properly be called 540i which would make a major impact to public perception. It's probably just a matter of personal preference. For myself, I can only describe 720p images as feeling more "solid" for lack of a better word -- less jittery or flickery maybe.

I do physics for a living, so I'm actually more engaged by a bit of research done by the BBC which suggests that for my particular viewing situation, my eye can't appreciate resolutions beyond 1280x720. If you're a science or engineering guy, this is interesting... http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/w...les/WHP092.pdf

On an anecdotal note, I recently had a DirecTV installer come to hook up a new HD receiver (DirecTV can't imagine a world where the customer could do this themselves??). The installer related that in the "thousands" of boxes he had hooked up, I was the first person to ask that he set the resolution to 720p. He just shook his head and grinned and said "oh yeah man,... you know it".

Last edited by ChuckSchick; 03-02-2009 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2009, 02:11 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckSchick View Post
I do physics for a living, so I'm actually more engaged by a bit of research done by the BBC which suggests that for my particular viewing situation, my eye can't appreciate resolutions beyond 1280x720. If you're a science or engineering guy, this is interesting... http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/w...les/WHP092.pdf

On an anecdotal note, I recently had a DirecTV installer come to hook up a new HD receiver (DirecTV can't imagine a world where the customer could do this themselves??). The installer related that in the "thousands" of boxes he had hooked up, I was the first person to ask that he set the resolution to 720p. He just shook his head and grinned and said "oh yeah man,... you know it".
It's not quite as cut and dry as that. Aside from the quality of the equipment being used. Resolution perception depends on the size of the screen and the viewing distance. In most home situations there probably isn't going to be an appreciable difference between 720p and 1080i/p. The difference really starts to rear it's head when you start going to larger and larger screens. We're talking above the meager home variety.

I have a friend who works at a local science museum in their IMAX dome theatre. They had been looking into moving from their current off-brand IMAX projector to a digital projector. They got a demonstration done and have determined that digital projection just isn't there yet for the size of screen they have. I believe they were using 2K resolution which is higher quality than 1080p and you could see pixels in the video. And I think even 4K resolution wouldn't be enough with their screen size.

Granted, most people aren't going to need even 2K resolution. But when you start talking about people with their own projection media rooms with screens well above 62" 1080p isn't really even enough.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-02-2009, 03:50 PM
PosterBoy PosterBoy is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 84
720P has a higher data rate than 1080I, so yes it is higher resolution in that respect.

http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/DTV_Bandwidths.htm

http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/default.htm

Kent
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-02-2009, 09:49 PM
TechJunkie TechJunkie is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA, Southern California
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by reggie14 View Post
I'm confused by this post. Several networks broadcast in 1080i. Are you claiming 720p is "higher" than 1080i?

SageGk-

Have you tried setting your HD200 to do native resolution switching, so it will switch to the resolution of the current video file? I have absolutely no idea if that would help. I'm just saying that because I would think (perhaps incorrectly) that most nice TVs would have better upscalers than the extenders.
I was not trying to do a comparison between the HD formats. A HD STB can output up tp 1080p. I could be totally wrong here, but it is my understanding that the maxuim resolution a TV station will broadcast in is 720p. So I was just suggesting that you record HD tv with the HD-PVR at 720p.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:02 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by TechJunkie View Post
I was not trying to do a comparison between the HD formats. A HD STB can output up tp 1080p. I could be totally wrong here, but it is my understanding that the maxuim resolution a TV station will broadcast in is 720p. So I was just suggesting that you record HD tv with the HD-PVR at 720p.
Nope TV stations either broadcast in 720p60 or 1080i30. They each require approximately the same amount of bandwidth.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-02-2009, 10:52 PM
reggie14 reggie14 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,760
Quote:
Originally Posted by PosterBoy View Post
720P has a higher data rate than 1080I, so yes it is higher resolution in that respect.

http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/DTV_Bandwidths.htm

http://alvyray.com/DigitalTV/default.htm
I really didn't intend to turn this into a which-is-better between 720p and 1080i. I really don't have a strong preference between the two. But, these links sort of intrigued me. The first link said that the data rate for 720p falls somewhere between that of 1080i as defined and 1080i as practiced (which they say is really 1035i). But, I haven't seen anything, other than a small number of anti-interlacing sites, that say 1080i broadcasts are really 1440x1035. My 1080i recordings definitely say they're 1920x1080 files. I did, however, find more sites that said early HDTVs really had 1440x1035 displays. That doesn't seem to be true anymore.

Is there any truth to the 1035i claim, or is it just anti-interlacing FUD?

In my case, my Samsung 630 set takes about a second to switch between resolutions, so I turned native resolution switching on. My TV seems to be a little better at upconverting than my HD100 (and I record HD via firewire and QAM, so I don't/can't use the HD receiver to upconvert).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-03-2009, 06:21 AM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by reggie14 View Post
Is there any truth to the 1035i claim, or is it just anti-interlacing FUD?
Not sure where they're coming from with the 1035i stuff. The resolution for all the stations here who broadcast in 1080i is 1920x1080 interlaced. I do know that either DirecTV or Dish were using an anamorphic 1440x1080i for their HD channels. But I've never heard of anyone using 1035i.

It appears that 1035i was the format used by the Japanese analog HD video standard.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD

Last edited by Taddeusz; 03-03-2009 at 06:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-03-2009, 06:42 AM
ChuckSchick ChuckSchick is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taddeusz View Post
... most people aren't going to need even 2K resolution. But when you start talking about people with their own projection media rooms with screens well above 62" 1080p isn't really even enough.
Very true. I'm viewing 52" screen from about 15' away typically so I could probably get by with 480p without discernible pixels.

Unfortunately, everyone on this board will probably be papering their theater room with video wallpaper in a decade or so. Then I'll be really lamenting the fact that I've downconverted all of my blu-ray rips to 720p! Oh well, I'll have a robot butler by then that I can get to re-rip all of my discs.

Alternately, given the current state of the economy, Instead of home theater for a hobby, I might be hot-gluing spikes on football pads for my next trip into the thunderdome.

Anyhow, how is the motion blur problem coming?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-04-2009, 11:40 AM
pjpjpjpj pjpjpjpj is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckSchick View Post
Very true. I'm viewing 52" screen from about 15' away typically so I could probably get by with 480p without discernible pixels.

Unfortunately, everyone on this board will probably be papering their theater room with video wallpaper in a decade or so. Then I'll be really lamenting the fact that I've downconverted all of my blu-ray rips to 720p! Oh well, I'll have a robot butler by then that I can get to re-rip all of my discs.
I like the people at (insert your local big-box store that sells HDTVs) who stand about two feet in front of a 65" LCD and then complain that it looks grainy. The fact that HDTV is meant to be viewed at a distance of "2.5x to 3x the screen size" away has been lost on most of America who all think "bigger is better" and want bragging rights of the largest HDTV in the neighborhood.

But I digress....
__________________
Server: AMD Athlon II x4 635 2.9GHz, 8 Gb RAM, Win 10 x64, Java 8, Gigabit network
Drives: Several TB of internal SATA and external USB drives, no NAS or RAID or such...
Software: SageTV v9x64, stock STV with ADM.
Tuners: 4 tuners via (2) HDHomeruns (100% OTA, DIY antennas in the attic).
Clients: Several HD300s, HD200s, even an old HD100, all on wired LAN. Latest firmware for each.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-04-2009, 05:16 PM
SageGk SageGk is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChuckSchick View Post

Anyhow, how is the motion blur problem coming?
I locked the box at 720p and no more blur/stutter. I'm not sure if I'm seeing grainy-ness on my 56" DLP or if it is in the broadcast but I'm leaving it at 720p for now.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is motion blur inevitable? tawd1992 Hardware Support 1 09-15-2007 09:33 AM
PVR-150 Driver for Tweak Tool & Motion Blur J_L_D Hardware Support 3 08-14-2006 09:59 PM
SageTV and "motion blur" kendryk SageTV Software 5 01-20-2005 02:29 PM
Help with Blur,HDTV connect:) Methius Hardware Support 12 10-19-2004 05:43 PM
ghosting/motion blur GbrNole SageTV Beta Test Software 0 03-24-2004 09:46 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.