SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > Hardware Support > Hardware Support
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

Hardware Support Discussions related to using various hardware setups with SageTV products. Anything relating to capture cards, remotes, infrared receivers/transmitters, system compatibility or other hardware related problems or suggestions should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #341  
Old 01-02-2007, 11:28 AM
gplasky's Avatar
gplasky gplasky is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Howell, MI
Posts: 9,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spratley
Does the HDHomeRun rely on windows software to interact with sage? I know it will work with MythTV, but will it work with SageTV for Linux?

Thanks

Paul
It's a Windows program that interacts with Sage. I don't think they tackled Sage for Linux yet.

Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr
_______
Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB.
Reply With Quote
  #342  
Old 01-02-2007, 03:04 PM
oddjob's Avatar
oddjob oddjob is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 184
it sounds like Sagetv does not provide the needed hooks for HD network capturing for Linux OEM version.
Reply With Quote
  #343  
Old 01-02-2007, 03:37 PM
gplasky's Avatar
gplasky gplasky is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Howell, MI
Posts: 9,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by oddjob
it sounds like Sagetv does not provide the needed hooks for HD network capturing for Linux OEM version.
The hooks are probably there. Silicondust Engineering would just probably need to create the little stub application like it did for the Windows version. A question probably best asked on the Silicondust Engineering forum.

Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr
_______
Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB.
Reply With Quote
  #344  
Old 01-03-2007, 10:35 AM
Polypro Polypro is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,804
The Birth Of The HDHR?

While searching...

http://forums.sagetv.com/forums/show...1&postcount=11

http://forums.sagetv.com/forums/show...6&postcount=28


Last edited by Polypro; 01-03-2007 at 10:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #345  
Old 01-03-2007, 11:13 AM
salsbst's Avatar
salsbst salsbst is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spratley
Does the HDHomeRun rely on windows software to interact with sage? I know it will work with MythTV, but will it work with SageTV for Linux?

Thanks

Paul
It should work fine with SageTV for Linux (as far as I know the SageTV Linux version isn't crippled in its ability to interact with network encoders), but you would need to install and run the HDHomeRun app on a Windows machine (unless you can run it under Mono or Rotor).
Reply With Quote
  #346  
Old 01-04-2007, 05:58 PM
tmiranda's Avatar
tmiranda tmiranda is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 5,851
No Unencrypted Channels!

Just received my HDHR. Installed .NET2, upgraded the firmware, ran a scan, and found all encrypted channels. When I called the cable company a few weeks ago they told me they did carry unencrypted QAM. Needless to say I am peeved.

I am fairly convinced I have not done anything wrong. The installation and setup was easy and went exactly as described by SiliconDust. I wonder what excuse the cable company will give me?

Is there anybody out there with some technical knowledge who can say if it is easy or difficult for the cable company to to change a channel from encrypted QAM to unencrypted QAM? I would think this is an easy technical matter but a difficult business matter.

I live in a rural (but growing) area serviced by a small cable company. Hopefully I will find somebody reasonable to listen to me.
__________________

Sage Server: 8th gen Intel based system w/32GB RAM running Ubuntu Linux, HDHomeRun Prime with cable card for recording. Runs headless. Accessed via RD when necessary. Four HD-300 Extenders.
Reply With Quote
  #347  
Old 01-04-2007, 06:34 PM
Goodspike's Avatar
Goodspike Goodspike is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 599
Have you tried AVSforum.com's local forum, to see if there's a thread for your small community system? They might know where the unencrypted channels are. Alternatively, your cable company may be able to tell you the assignments for the local channels.
Reply With Quote
  #348  
Old 01-04-2007, 06:35 PM
blade blade is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,500
New firmware has been released today that appears to fix all of my problems. I now get 6-8 additional channels that were previously showing as no data.

I highly suggest running a new channel scan especially if you weren't getting all the channels you were expecting. It is possible that some of the unencrypted channels were showing incorrectly as no data.

tmiranda,
Be sure to try the new firmware. If you're certain they're encrypted it won't help, but if you're just assuming because they weren't detected there may be hope.
Reply With Quote
  #349  
Old 01-04-2007, 08:37 PM
RicoSuave RicoSuave is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Smile satisfied new sage user because of HDHR

Hello all - I needed to express my excitement and also ask a few questions...
Background - I'm a ReplayTV user - 3 networked units on 3 TVs. But I now have 2 HDTVs and I need HD recording and multi-room capability. SageTV with the HDHomerun seemed like part of the answer.

Today my HDHomerun arrived and I have it working with SageTV, recording 2 things at once and it's just great. The device is perfect for my needs. I tend to record 80% regular network TV - but I also need to occasionally record stuff off the encrypted channels. Sure, the cablecard solution will come someday but I can't wait for that. So I tried the DCT firewire solution which I got working but all my non-network stuff was 5C protected (even ESPN, TBS, SciFi, etc) So I figure if I'm going to record from the cable box, I'll just need to do it the old-fashioned way with an IR blaster and an S-Video input. (yuck, SDTV).

So, I want something just like the HDHR, but instead it's just for controlling a cable box that is a capture device that streams the results to the network and it works in SageTV. Does anything like this exist? If not, and the answer is a USB-based Hauppauge device or something, which is the easiest and cleanest (well-supported) to use with SageTV? The goal is to pipe SVideo output from the cable box to SageTV, and have SageTV control it as a 3rd tuner. Do I want to try to have the capture device IR-blasting the cable box, or should I be using the USB-UIRT solution?

thanks for all the help...-Ed
Reply With Quote
  #350  
Old 01-05-2007, 06:06 AM
tmiranda's Avatar
tmiranda tmiranda is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 5,851
Goodspike - I checked AVS, nothing there at all for my provider. Can you explain your suggestion about calling the cable company and asking for assignments? Are you implying that even though the HDHR reports "no signal" there still may be channels?

Blade - I downloaded and installed the latest firmware last night.
__________________

Sage Server: 8th gen Intel based system w/32GB RAM running Ubuntu Linux, HDHomeRun Prime with cable card for recording. Runs headless. Accessed via RD when necessary. Four HD-300 Extenders.
Reply With Quote
  #351  
Old 01-05-2007, 07:55 AM
MTuckman's Avatar
MTuckman MTuckman is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 120
I ended up calling Comcast when I was having trouble with one of the QAM channels I was "almost" receiving to ask about the unencrypted channels they send out. It wasn't until I talked to the 4th or 5th technician that I was able to get some straight answers. One of the customer service reps told me they didn't "like the idea" of my tuning in the QAM channels directly, they would prefer me to use their cable box!

In the end, when I found the right technician, he was able to confirm the channels I was already receiving OK, and that the couple I was having trouble with were "partially" encrypted.

The other thing I did was to sit down with the HDHR GUI, and go through each channel one by one, just checking each channel and sub channel, to confirm the channels. I also found that by changing some of my cables, I was able to tune in one or two channels that were not coming in.

Have you tried to hook up ONLY the HDHR to your inbound feed, with as little between it and the cable demarc point as possible? I am finding that even though the GUI reports a good signal on some channels, it is not enough for it to accurately tune in the channel.
__________________
Mike : Technical Architect / Software Engineer
HTPC : Intel® Core 2 Q6600 2.4GHz Quad Core Processor, 3GB RAM, 1TB DASD, Vista Home Prem, HdHomerun (2x Comcast QAM)
Main TV: Samsung 56" HDTV - STX-HD100 720p - HDMI - Sony DG910
Reply With Quote
  #352  
Old 01-05-2007, 08:09 AM
blade blade is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiranda
Goodspike - I checked AVS, nothing there at all for my provider. Can you explain your suggestion about calling the cable company and asking for assignments? Are you implying that even though the HDHR reports "no signal" there still may be channels?
That's what was happening to me, which is why I had thought maybe the latest firmware might help you as well. I had 6 channels that worked perfectly and I knew for a fact that two more were in the clear. Once I found the frequency they were broadcast on I saw that they were being shown as having no data. I provided jafa with an unfiltered stream of the channel and he was able to create a fix (the newest firmware). I just counted and am now getting 10 more channels thanks to the new firmware.

If you know what channel they're broadcast on or even just the frequency you can determine if they're being detected as encrypted or no data. If it's no data then there might be something that can be done to fix it.
Reply With Quote
  #353  
Old 01-05-2007, 09:53 AM
Polypro Polypro is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,804
If you call your cable company, ask the first person who answers the phone that you need to discuss "Quadrature Amplitude Modulation"...should cut down on the number of hand-offs

P
Reply With Quote
  #354  
Old 01-05-2007, 10:17 AM
Goodspike's Avatar
Goodspike Goodspike is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmiranda
Goodspike - I checked AVS, nothing there at all for my provider. Can you explain your suggestion about calling the cable company and asking for assignments? Are you implying that even though the HDHR reports "no signal" there still may be channels?

Blade - I downloaded and installed the latest firmware last night.
I didn't realize you were getting a no signal report--I just thought you were having trouble finding the unencrypted channels.
Reply With Quote
  #355  
Old 01-05-2007, 07:49 PM
White94Cobra's Avatar
White94Cobra White94Cobra is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 557
Well I went to my local Charter office to discuss QAM reception of HD locals with a tech. He indicated to me that they encrypt everything except a few music channels. I mentioned the FCC must-carry rule and he said they don't care about it and good luck filing a complaint. It appears no HD locals for me, except the spotty reception I get OTA
__________________
----------------------------------------------
Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz, 4 Gig DDR2-800, 8.5 TB storage, 8800GTS PCIe, Windows 7 32bit, Hauppauge HD-PVR, Hauppauge HVR-2250, HD-HomeRun, Fusion 5 USB Gold ATSC, SageTV v7.x, HD100, HD200, HD300, 60" Mitsubishi DLP
Reply With Quote
  #356  
Old 01-05-2007, 07:52 PM
fyodor fyodor is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 224
There's always firewire. Many channels that are QAM encrypted are still available through firewire.
Reply With Quote
  #357  
Old 01-05-2007, 11:07 PM
jkohn jkohn is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by White94Cobra
Well I went to my local Charter office to discuss QAM reception of HD locals with a tech. He indicated to me that they encrypt everything except a few music channels. I mentioned the FCC must-carry rule and he said they don't care about it and good luck filing a complaint. It appears no HD locals for me, except the spotty reception I get OTA
I suggest filing a complaint. Maybe even contacting local press to see if they're interested in the story, or if this cable co is an affiliate/branch go over his head and write to corporate headquarters.
Reply With Quote
  #358  
Old 01-05-2007, 11:54 PM
White94Cobra's Avatar
White94Cobra White94Cobra is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 557
Here's the complaint I'm considering filing. I think I'll send it to Charter first to give them a chance to respond. Now I just need to find a good Charter address to send it to.

To whom it may concern -

It is my understanding the local cable operators are to provide the local area broadcasts in the basic programming tier. It is also my understanding that this rule applies to both the analog and digital broadcast format (QAM to be specific). I recently purchased a new TV that has a digital tuner (ATSC and QAM capable). Unfortunately I am unable to receive several of the local digital broadcasts via antenna. I subscribe to the basic tier of my cable company (as well as high-speed Internet), so I attempted to receive the digital broadcast of my local affiliates via the cable feed. Unfortunately our cable company encrypts the digital broadcast of these channels. In speaking directly with a technician at the local cable office, he indicated that it was his interpretation of FCC regulations that they should not be encrypting the digital broadcast of the local channels, but he was unable to do anything about it. If I wanted to receive the local digital channels via cable, I would have to subscribe to their digital cable tier and purchase the HD option (raising the cost from $20/month to over $60/month). I would like to lodge a formal complaint against Charter Communications in Medford, Oregon. The local administration office phone number is 541-779-1814. Please contact me if you require additional information. Thank you.

Sincerely,

David Forehand
d-forehand@charter.net
__________________
----------------------------------------------
Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz, 4 Gig DDR2-800, 8.5 TB storage, 8800GTS PCIe, Windows 7 32bit, Hauppauge HD-PVR, Hauppauge HVR-2250, HD-HomeRun, Fusion 5 USB Gold ATSC, SageTV v7.x, HD100, HD200, HD300, 60" Mitsubishi DLP
Reply With Quote
  #359  
Old 01-06-2007, 12:07 AM
AndyS AndyS is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 383
I'd suggest doing some research before filing a complaint. It is my understanding that the must-carry rule requires the carrier to provide the station in analog OR digital format, but not necessarily both. As the carrier is certainly already providing the signal in analog format they may not be legally mandated to provide an additional QAM signal in-the-clear.

This is from what I've read on the web, and I'm not an expert.

I hope you end up with a successful outcome.

Andy.
Reply With Quote
  #360  
Old 01-06-2007, 12:54 AM
White94Cobra's Avatar
White94Cobra White94Cobra is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 557
From the debates I've read on AVS it seems it can be interpreted either way. I did read a statement that quoted some FCC reg that the digital broadcasts are to be treated the same as the anolog.

I would think the worst that could happen is that the FCC doesn't respond. They could always reply that the cable company is in-the-right and I guess that would settle it.
__________________
----------------------------------------------
Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz, 4 Gig DDR2-800, 8.5 TB storage, 8800GTS PCIe, Windows 7 32bit, Hauppauge HD-PVR, Hauppauge HVR-2250, HD-HomeRun, Fusion 5 USB Gold ATSC, SageTV v7.x, HD100, HD200, HD300, 60" Mitsubishi DLP
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.