|
SageTV Linux Discussion related to the SageTV Media Center for Linux. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to the SageTV Linux should be posted here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Diskless Client (Compactflash only)?
I'm wondering what kind of disk activity takes place in the Client, specifically what writes. I know that wiz.bin and sageclient.properties get written away but what else is there? I'm thinking that it would be cool to create a diskless client using an EPIA-MII and a compact-flash card to hold the OS, but it would only work well if the number of writes to the card were kept to a low number.
Anyone have any thoughts? Andy. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm looking at this technology next week for a business application, but the thought of it tickles me pink to be honest. Can you imagine having diskless workstations for clients that PXE booted from the same server that you use for SageTV?
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney Last edited by SHS; 01-31-2006 at 07:02 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I noticed on their forum that they used to be "Venturecom" who made a product called BXP (Boot XP). I'm guessing that BXP was an early version of Ardence 'Desktop' now. Anyhow, about 3 years ago some of the folks on the AVSforum did a group buy of the BXP software from one of the european distributors of it.
You might consider talking to them (Ardence) about doing a group buy again for us. They obviously don't consider HTPC use in there marketing, but it could be a viable thing. As I recall, the group buy was like $200-$250 for a server and 5 client license. It'd be great if we could get something for even less. Have you had a chance to actually try it out yet? I'm curious to see what impact it could have on network traffic. -PGPfan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have a 30 day evaluation of Ardence desktop and have installed Sage Client on it. In the small testings I have done it works really well! Booting XP takes 90 seconds instead of 50 when running on an old disk. But when XP is up and running I have not seen any performance degradation at all (in light Office use and with Sage Client). And in my current test machine I am only using 100Mbit, in a real situation I will use 1Gbit network.
I am thinking of building a client with Pentium M and use an external power supply to make the machine really small and quiet. I am defenately interested if it is possible to make a better price in a group buy. Anders |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I have already done a similar thing with a linux client. You need to install a nfs server on the sagetv server and install another copy of sagetv in a new home directory (note that you need to have a second license and activate the second copy using the client computer). You then install a tftp server and configure pxelinux (http://syslinux.zytor.com/pxe.php) to boot the kernel with the root file system as the nfs partition.
If any of you is interested I could post a more complete guide. _Demo_ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I would like a more complete explenation on this please.
I would like to create a linux small client and I have a gig net card. I want to mod a small cd and boot a client of it(cd player - yamaha)
__________________
Server SageTv 6.3.5, Core2Duo 6300 ,2Gigs ,Saphire x1650, PVR250, 2*320GB + 160GB, java 1.6.1 Client SageTV Client 6.3.5 , AMD 3000, 1024Mb, Saphire x1600Pro256HDMI, java 1.6.1 Using Nielm's Web server 2.22 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I'd forgotten about PXE - that does seem like the way to go and I've done it before. However, what I've seen in the past is that you get the original image back every time you restart, so wiz.bin and sageclient.properties changes would get lost. How do these PXE solutions deal with storage of volatile data?
Andy. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Anders |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
More conveluted than what Anders said, but I think Windows (and the sage client) would be more resilient.
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Though, I can't complain too much, as support for drivers is more robust and mainstream in Windows than Linux. *SHRUG*
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Anders |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too expensive for most people for this type of use, however, for a work type environment, it's so freakin' cool and justifyable. I really dig the integration with AD that they have for the same static machine to be able to have different machine accounts. Anywho... Sorry to have hijack'd the thread considering this is way too expensive for home use.
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Andy, did you see my post regarding AVS having done a 'group buy' on an earlier version of this product? It's definately too expensive IF we are stuck paying what corporations pay, but it IS possible to get it cheaper. The question is, are there enough folks here interested in a 'group buy' to actually make it worth pursueing?
-PGPfan |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"OBS. Du betaler jo ikke for "Serveren" til dine klienter!" which means "OBS. You do not pay for the server for your clients!". When you buy more then 10 clients the licensing becomes different but the actual price per client should be lower. This is not exactly free either, but for a silent computer that is something I am ready to pay. If enough people are interested I can ask for a price if we buy together. Anders |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Anders,
Perhaps you could talk to your distributor in advance and ask what we might be able to arrange for: Server and 5 clients is xxx.xx Each additional client is xxx.xx Pricing for the following packages: 1-5 'packages' for xxx.xx 6-12 'packages' for xxx.xx 12-20 'packages' for xxx.xx 20+ 'packages' for xxx.xx One 'package' would constitute 1-Server and 5-Clients. Maybe this might help stimulate some interest here. -PGPfan |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
For $250 you could buy a pretty big CF card with an IDE->CF adapter or just a USB flash drive and use nLite to shrink your XP installation.... I guess my whole thing is that I get that doing a PXE is neat, but I don't think it justifies dropping $250 + just to do something overkill like that, it's not even expandable unless you drop more money into licences... then you also get into bugs that might exist, etc... Last edited by AboveUnrefined; 02-01-2006 at 06:03 PM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
There are MANY reasons that this would be desireable. If you don't see a need, you aren't being forced into it. As for CF, it just not meant to be used to boot from regardless of wether or not you can get an CF/IDE adapter. I've tried that numerous times before and performance in general is poor at best. This is why there is a recognized need for device like the I-Ram.
-PGPfan |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Actually Andy, that's not correct. AVSforum DID a groupbuy (with about 20 people participating) and what I posted (like $200-$250 for a server and 5 client license) was what they actually paid for. Due to personal reasons I couldn't participate, but was planning on it so I'm well aware of the costs involved.
Granted this was when the company was called "Venturcom" and the product was "BXP" but it IS the same exact thing. The upside for the company is simple, they get the 'word out' about their product that could generate future revenue. Downside is that they don't make a big profit on these FEW sales. Most companies will do such a thing, knowing that the HTPC market will have absolutely NO impact on their current sales, but the exposure of their software just might. As Anders stated above also, the software isn't as expensive as you've been told, at least not if you look around a little bit. -PGPfan |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|