SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > Hardware Support > Hardware Support
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

Hardware Support Discussions related to using various hardware setups with SageTV products. Anything relating to capture cards, remotes, infrared receivers/transmitters, system compatibility or other hardware related problems or suggestions should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-02-2012, 12:07 PM
tvmaster2's Avatar
tvmaster2 tvmaster2 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: tarana
Posts: 4,241
SSD drive recommendations / experiences

thinking of going SSD with my SageTV server boot/system drive.

thinking 60gb should be enough for Win 7 (opinions welcome)

any recommendations, advice or experiences from different brands, etc?

Is there an SSD thread here that I haven't been able to find, if so, link to that would be helpful too.

thanks as always
__________________
Sage 9 server = Gigabyte AMD quad-core - 4 gigs - integrated ATI HD4200 chipset - SSD boot, Hitachi Deskstar show drives. HD-PVR - Colossus - Win7 32 bit. HD200/300’s networked. HDHomerun tuner. "If you've given up on Weird Al, you've given up on life" - Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-02-2012, 12:14 PM
BobPhoenix BobPhoenix is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,152
Sorry too lazy to find the link for you.

I have/had 3 SageTV servers running on 40GB OCZ Vertex 2 SSDs - smallest I would recommend. 2 are headless and show 2/3 full all the time other was also used for viewing and ran out of space before I upgraded. 60GB should be fine but I went with 80GB because it was the only one I could get locally when I upgraded. Was a better SSD anyway as it was Intel (more good ratings on Newegg). Although I have never had a problem with my OCZs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:36 PM
jlmdxtv jlmdxtv is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 182
I use an older 60GB Kingston SSD with Windows 8 on my SageTV server.

I don't have more than 20GB in use, but i wouldn't mind a bigger device so that over time it could spread the writes over a larger area and help the SSD last longer (in theory), since the SSD can only write to the same cells some fixed number of times (whatever that is).

I also use SysInternal's FileMon to see what's being written (i.e. what's causing the writes) to the SSD to help me reduce the writes to the minimum, as well as follow other optimizing techniques found on the web for keeping the SSDs lasting longer.

john
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-02-2012, 02:38 PM
IVB's Avatar
IVB IVB is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oak-town, CA
Posts: 1,083
this is the link for the SageTV thread, experience seems positive.

CQC'ers definitely worse experiences.
__________________
------------------------------------
My Home Automation YouTube channel
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2012, 08:36 AM
tvmaster2's Avatar
tvmaster2 tvmaster2 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: tarana
Posts: 4,241
thanks for the help folks, and the thread
__________________
Sage 9 server = Gigabyte AMD quad-core - 4 gigs - integrated ATI HD4200 chipset - SSD boot, Hitachi Deskstar show drives. HD-PVR - Colossus - Win7 32 bit. HD200/300’s networked. HDHomerun tuner. "If you've given up on Weird Al, you've given up on life" - Homer Simpson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2012, 10:43 AM
davephan's Avatar
davephan davephan is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,911
I bought a Crucial RealSSD C300 CTFDDAC128MAG-1G1 2.5" 128GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive for my general purpose computer. I haven't bought one for the SageTV computer yet.

I think 60 gigs is a bit small. It would be better to us a 128 gig so you don't have to worry about running out of space on the operating system/programs drive. Boot times are drastically faster than the old mechanical drives. Program open much faster. I heard that the SageTV extender response times are faster with the SSD instead of a mechanical drive. I purchased the drive February 2011 and it has been running perfectly since. When shopping for SSDs, read the reviews about response time. Some SSDs are very slow compared to other SSDs.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820148348


Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2012, 12:37 PM
IVB's Avatar
IVB IVB is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oak-town, CA
Posts: 1,083
On that note, for those of you using your server to perform multi-duty, DavePhan is totally on mark, size matters. I use my server for SageTV, Picasa, CQC, DropBox, GoogleDrive, SqueezeCenter, and a few other things i'm blanking on. Picasa alone has a tendency to explode the db size, and its only usable on drive C.

64GB might be "good enough", but given that my read of various people's experiences show that SSD would be iffy, i'll go with a rotational HD but setup a 120GB drive C partition.
__________________
------------------------------------
My Home Automation YouTube channel
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2012, 01:03 PM
MattHelm MattHelm is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by IVB View Post
On that note, for those of you using your server to perform multi-duty, DavePhan is totally on mark, size matters. I use my server for SageTV, Picasa, CQC, DropBox, GoogleDrive, SqueezeCenter, and a few other things i'm blanking on. Picasa alone has a tendency to explode the db size, and its only usable on drive C.

64GB might be "good enough", but given that my read of various people's experiences show that SSD would be iffy, i'll go with a rotational HD but setup a 120GB drive C partition.
If you are running Windows Vista or newer, you can use NTFS symbolic link. I use this on my current windows box to move the entire "Users" ("User"?) directory to my HD, from my SSD. This is the directory most written to (other than temp), and as my SSDs are 1st gen, it really extends their life.
__________________
Server #1= AMD A10-5800, 8G RAM, F2A85-M PRO, 12TB, HDHomerun Prime, HDHR, Colossus (Playback - HD-200)
Server #2= AMD X2 3800+, 2G RAM, M2NPV-VM, 2TB, 3x HDHR OTA (Playback - HD-200)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2012, 03:59 PM
simonen simonen is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 384
The only thing I gained was a faster boot time, everything else remained the same including experience with the extenders.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2012, 05:10 PM
routerunner's Avatar
routerunner routerunner is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by simonen View Post
The only thing I gained was a faster boot time, everything else remained the same including experience with the extenders.
As Fuzzy pointed out, nothing is faster than RAM, consider a RamDisk and please have a look at this thread here. It did help improving the user experience with extenders.

Eddy
__________________

Automatic Power Off | Squeezeslave | DVB-S Importer | DVB Decrypter & Card Client | Tuner Preroll


Every man is a damn fool for at least five minutes every day; wisdom consists in not exceeding the limit. ~ Elbert Hubbard

Last edited by routerunner; 05-03-2012 at 05:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-04-2012, 02:03 AM
IVB's Avatar
IVB IVB is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oak-town, CA
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattHelm View Post
If you are running Windows Vista or newer, you can use NTFS symbolic link. I use this on my current windows box to move the entire "Users" ("User"?) directory to my HD, from my SSD. This is the directory most written to (other than temp), and as my SSDs are 1st gen, it really extends their life.
yeah, unfortunately one box runs WHS v1 and the other is XP.

May be time to finally upgrade one of them. But if I do that, I may as well create the boot partition to 200GB eliminating the need for symbolic links :-)
__________________
------------------------------------
My Home Automation YouTube channel
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-04-2012, 03:13 AM
routerunner's Avatar
routerunner routerunner is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by IVB View Post
yeah, unfortunately one box runs WHS v1 and the other is XP.
If you don't need to link to network shares (which according to what you posted I believe you don't) you can use NTFS junction point which are basically the same thing as NTFS symbolic link and available since Windows 2000.

My thread about way to increase browsing speed with fanart talks about NTFS junction point and explain how to use it.

Eddy
__________________

Automatic Power Off | Squeezeslave | DVB-S Importer | DVB Decrypter & Card Client | Tuner Preroll


Every man is a damn fool for at least five minutes every day; wisdom consists in not exceeding the limit. ~ Elbert Hubbard

Last edited by routerunner; 05-04-2012 at 04:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-04-2012, 10:42 AM
MattHelm MattHelm is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by routerunner View Post
... NTFS junction point which are basically the same thing as NTFS symbolic link...
Anyone know the "real" difference between the two? On XP are they invisible to everything also??? (so I could move a system directory this way, and ALL programs would honor it?)
__________________
Server #1= AMD A10-5800, 8G RAM, F2A85-M PRO, 12TB, HDHomerun Prime, HDHR, Colossus (Playback - HD-200)
Server #2= AMD X2 3800+, 2G RAM, M2NPV-VM, 2TB, 3x HDHR OTA (Playback - HD-200)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2012, 10:50 AM
routerunner's Avatar
routerunner routerunner is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Wiltshire, UK
Posts: 1,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattHelm View Post
Anyone know the "real" difference between the two? On XP are they invisible to everything also??? (so I could move a system directory this way, and ALL programs would honor it?)
By invisible you mean "transparent" to ALL programs? Yes, they will honour it, is the OS than hides everything.

Please have a look here for a detailed explanation.

Eddy
__________________

Automatic Power Off | Squeezeslave | DVB-S Importer | DVB Decrypter & Card Client | Tuner Preroll


Every man is a damn fool for at least five minutes every day; wisdom consists in not exceeding the limit. ~ Elbert Hubbard
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-05-2012, 12:59 AM
mtpudelko mtpudelko is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by davephan View Post
I bought a Crucial RealSSD C300 CTFDDAC128MAG-1G1 2.5" 128GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive for my general purpose computer. I haven't bought one for the SageTV computer yet.

I think 60 gigs is a bit small. It would be better to us a 128 gig so you don't have to worry about running out of space on the operating system/programs drive. Boot times are drastically faster than the old mechanical drives. Program open much faster. I heard that the SageTV extender response times are faster with the SSD instead of a mechanical drive. I purchased the drive February 2011 and it has been running perfectly since. When shopping for SSDs, read the reviews about response time. Some SSDs are very slow compared to other SSDs.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820148348


Dave
Same here. 128GB is kind of a sweet spot for me as well. I've had a 256GB C300 from about 18 months for my main development machine; the more I watched my STV box take forever to boot, the more I hated it. I finally caved and put a Crucial M4 128 in that thing in January and haven't looked back, it boots in about 20 secs and is noticeably more responsive in the UI. If you really get into major geek mode and compare, the M4's benchmark faster, but in practice, I sure can't notice any difference between the older C300 and M4's. Regardless of model, after swapping an SSD into just about all of mine, I would never go back to a non-SSD for a system boot drive.

Now's a great time to consider an SSD. The past two weeks or so seems like the beginning of an all-out SSD price war. I picked up another 128GB M4 for $110 shipped on buy.com this past week for a laptop, about 40% below the same drive cost in Jan. Today Amazon had a 256GB M4 for $205 for a very short time. It looks like under $1/GB is quickly becoming the new norm.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-07-2012, 07:04 PM
wayner wayner is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 7,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by simonen View Post
The only thing I gained was a faster boot time, everything else remained the same including experience with the extenders.
I didn't do a scientific experiment but I swear that my extenders are more responsive since I switched to a SSD. Boot time is way faster but that doesn't matter too much as I generally go weeks between boots.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA
Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA
Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 TB drive recommendations, Green? davephan Hardware Support 5 01-14-2010 06:27 PM
MVP experiences in 6.2.4? KJake SageTV Beta Test Software 3 07-05-2007 06:31 PM
RC1 Experiences m0ng00se30 SageTV Beta Test Software 73 04-30-2004 12:31 PM
RC2 Experiences ckron SageTV Beta Test Software 39 04-26-2004 11:09 PM
RC2 Experiences ckron SageTV Beta Test Software 1 04-26-2004 06:08 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.