|
SageTV Placeshifter Discussion related to the SageTV Placeshifter application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to the SageTV Placeshifter software application should be posted here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Placeshifting HD shows over the net
My internet upload speed is 800kbps.
When I am away from home and want to watch HD shows streamed from my home Sage server am I better off recording my shows on an SD channel and watching that via PS rather than recording on an HD channel on my HD-PVRs or OTA tuners? It would seem to me that it would probably be less prone to problems to stream an SD show, especially since my upload speed is the real bottleneck.
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Well Placeshifting a HD-PVR recording means transcoding on the server. So any SD show (HD-PVR) will require less transcoding and less bandwidth. Your OTA should be mpg2 so no transcoding. But again SD will require less bandwidth.
Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr _______ Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I would record the SD shows on a PVR 150 tuner rather than the HD-PVR so that should make things easier. Even though OTA shows are in MPG don't they have to be transcoded down to a lower bitrate to fit though a pipe that is, at best, 800 kbps?
__________________
New Server - Sage9 on unRAID 2xHD-PVR, HDHR for OTA Old Server - Sage7 on Win7Pro-i660CPU with 4.6TB, HD-PVR, HDHR OTA, HVR-1850 OTA Clients - 2xHD-300, 8xHD-200 Extenders, Client+2xPlaceshifter and a WHS which acts as a backup Sage server |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think anything happens on the server side depending on your upload speed. I think it is based on the Placeshifter client which would dynamically adjust for what it is receiving.
Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr _______ Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I'm pretty sure wayner is right on this one.... The server will transcode the show in real time (pretty much all shows) to fit in the bandwidth it has available (which is usually limited by your upload speed). Sage does a connection test between the server and client and then determines the amount of compression that needs to be done.... and if you use sagetv's "Dynamic Streaming System" it will auto adjust the streaming settings if necessary.
__________________
Server 2003 r2 32bit, SageTV9 (finally!) 2x Dual HDHR (OTA), 1x HD-PVR (Comcast), 1x HDHR-3CC via SageDCT (Comcast) 2x HD300, 1x SageClient (Win10 Test/Development) Check out TVExplorer |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I have a more than capable server with an upload rate of about 9mbps, I think the live transcoder that SageTV is using is being limited. I should be able to get near HD quality with a good transcoder with the proper settings. Not sure if you guys are familar with airvideo or streamtome but these iphone apps run a process on a host machine that uses ffmpeg to realtime transcode HD content to the iphone/ipad. When I use the VGA output of the iphone or ipad with these apps the quality is pretty good. I'm disappointed the transcoder with sagetv is not on the same level.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Define more than capable server. Sage also uses ffmpeg for transcoding.
Gerry
__________________
Big Gerr _______ Server - WHS 2011: Sage 7.1.9 - 1 x HD Prime and 2 x HDHomeRun - Intel Atom D525 1.6 GHz, Acer Easystore, RAM 4 GB, 4 x 2TB hotswap drives, 1 x 2TB USB ext Clients: 2 x PC Clients, 1 x HD300, 2 x HD-200, 1 x HD-100 DEV Client: Win 7 Ultimate 64 bit - AMD 64 x2 6000+, Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H MB, RAM 4GB, HD OS:500GB, DATA:1 x 500GB, Pace RGN STB. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
My upload speed is 720kbps and both PS on my laptop and PS on an HD200 are unwatchable - constant stuttering of video and audio - regardless of the download speed at that location. Any help would be appreciated.
__________________
Mick HP Mediasmart EX-485 server with 4.5tb storage, running Sagetv 7.0.23; 2 Hauppauge HD-PVRs; 2 Directv Receivers (H20 and H21 channel changing by usb/serial/usb cables); 4 Sagetv HD-200s; 1 Sagetv HD-300; Carada Criterion 126" screen; Definitive Technology speakers (UIW RLS II x 3, UIW BP/A x 2, DI 5.5BPS x 2, IWSub 10/10), Pioneer KRP-500M Kuro plasma; Pioneer Elite SC-07 receiver; Panasonic TH-50PH9UK plasma; Sharp Aquos LC-C4067U LCD; Oppo BDP-83 Blu-Ray player. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I too have found anything recorded in HD to not be watchable using Placeshifter. I have a very fast download that I'm trying to use it on as well as a very fast upload at the Sage server. The limiting factor for me is my server computer is not a speed demon. This leads me to think the bottleneck is in the server computer. Also, I'm not even expecting to watch HD... I just was wanting it to be watchable. I've even tried manually adjusting the Placeshifter settings way down and it still skips and stutters.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I have a i7 950 box and a q6600 box I have been playing with. Well that's good to know it uses ffmpeg so the right foundation is there. I just need it to use better settings when doing live transcoding to an extender client in placeshifter mode so I can obtain a better quality image.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I've had better luck with improved picture quality by specifying my own settings with my average bandwidth along with increased number of B Frames and decreasing the output resolution.
I reasoned that a lower output resolution along with higher B Frames (delta frames) seemed like it would require less bandwidth and my ATI card seems to do a good job of cleaning up the final image to look ok. I wouldn't call the picture quality great but it is ok for non sporting events and a bit below par for sports. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I am getting pretty decent picture quality using a quad core system to PS the HD channels to my HD300 hooked up to a 32" LCD TV (2Mbs upload).
FF and RW is the most annoying part; it is slow to respond. Last edited by simonen; 11-23-2010 at 08:26 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
And your doing it over the internet? I was looking for at least DVD quality which I can't seem to get for my 720p mkv. . What are your settings on the sage server and your hd300(I have one as well).
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Yeap, over the internet. No special settings configured, everything is default on both sides. I have a 2Mbs upload from my home which makes a big difference, otherwise I don't think it would work out so well. Like I said, the menu navigation and FF/RW is sluggish, but I can deal with it.
I am not sure if the transcoder is multi-threaded now or not, but I remember a few releases ago, I couldn't PS HD recordings because it was only using one core to transcode. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I guess it all boils down to what your calling "decent video quality"..lol
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
There are two factors in determining the quality/experience you'll get with Placeshifter.
First, is the CPU. Regardless of the bandwidth, you have to have a fast enough processor to be able to decode the content, scale it, and encode it - on a single core. If you can't keep up with this, it will stutter/skip. Second, is the bandwidth. Placeshifter will adjust the bandwidth used on the fly, using the client end's buffer as a guide. If the buffer is running closer to empty, it will switch to a lower bandwidth to get it to fill back up. If the buffer is full, it will switch to a higher bandwidth to get better quality. All video in placeshifter goes through this transcoding process, regardless of it's original format (unless the transcoding is explicitly disabled in the Setup). There are also other complications that may be affecting some people. Unless you're using a newer version of sage (v7+), it used an older version of ffmpeg, that had problems with interlaced H.264 material. This would cause stuttering, regardless of the cpu available.
__________________
Buy Fuzzy a beer! (Fuzzy likes beer) unRAID Server: i7-6700, 32GB RAM, Dual 128GB SSD cache and 13TB pool, with SageTVv9, openDCT, Logitech Media Server and Plex Media Server each in Dockers. Sources: HRHR Prime with Charter CableCard. HDHR-US for OTA. Primary Client: HD-300 through XBoxOne in Living Room, Samsung HLT-6189S Other Clients: Mi Box in Master Bedroom, HD-200 in kids room |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any issues with .NET ? | Slack | SageTV Software | 3 | 02-14-2007 09:53 AM |
.NET Plugin Example? | MadAxeMan | SageTV Studio | 8 | 10-06-2006 11:42 AM |
Windows .NET Framework 1.1 | broderp | General Discussion | 6 | 08-07-2005 11:52 PM |
MS Hotfix for .NET Framework | Ken C | General Discussion | 7 | 06-03-2005 05:30 PM |
.NET vs. Java | ptaylor | SageTV Software | 7 | 06-23-2004 11:21 AM |