SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV Development and Customizations > SageTV Customizations > SageMC Custom Interface
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageMC Custom Interface This forum is for discussing the user-created SageMC custom interface for SageTV.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:06 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Comskip Skipping Accuracy On Extenders vs Clients

I run Show Analyzer on my server and have noticed a difference in the accuracy of the positions of the skips for HDPVR recordings on my extenders compared to when they are played on my Client or Placeshifter. Skips on either software clients are pretty much dead on. However in comparison, skipping on my extenders appears to be off by a substantial amount.

Is there any way this can be fixed or worked around?
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:11 PM
Brent Brent is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: KC, Missouri
Posts: 3,695
Not sure about placeshifter, but the accuracy seems exactly the same on my HTPC computer versus each of the extenders in my home. I'm not even sure I know why it would be different. I am using comskip though and not ShowAnalyzer
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2009, 01:39 PM
CollinR CollinR is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,305
There is an adjustment in the stv that allows you to specify an offset for skipping. Maybe you have a value stuck in there, this effects all comskip not just from a specific source though.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2009, 03:48 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
It's odd to me that there is a difference. But there is. I kind of wonder whether or not it has to do with decoder differences in the extenders vs clients.

The way I noticed this was that I did all my tuning at work via Placeshifter. Then when I got home and started watching stuff on my extenders it was all off by a small amount. Sometimes by enough to really be annoying.

Not sure if adjusting the start and stop offsets would be enough due to some noticed variability.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2009, 04:06 PM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Probably semantics, but the difference isn't in comskip, it's in the accuracy of the seeking of the PC vs the extender. I thought at one point Sage added something to help accuracy and there was a property to define how long Sage should try to seek to exactly the right place, but I can't find it at the moment.

-edit

These might be it:
miniplayer/align_iframes_on_seek=true
miniplayer/num_reseek_attempts=3
miniplayer/seek_diff_for_reseek=2000
http://forums.sage.tv/forums/showthr...iff_for_reseek

Last edited by stanger89; 12-30-2009 at 04:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2009, 04:27 PM
bits bits is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 398
I agree with stranger89 that it is probably not comskip responsible for the difference between server, client or Placeshifter.

FWIW I have semiautomatically cut thousands of commercials using comskip over the last 6+ years and it is not perfect, not by a long shot. However, IMO and in my experience it is more accurate more often over a wider range of TV shows/stations/formats than anything else out there. But the bottom line is that you have to expect the start and end of a commercial segment to be off up to 30% of the time. The larger the variety of TV shows/stations you record the more likely it will be to run into some errors. I recently started using the comskip stvi and I am quite pleased with it. In fact I have pretty much stopped cutting commercials.

What I mean by semi-automatic is that I manually confirmed the commercial segment start and end before batch processing the files and removing the commercials.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-30-2009, 04:40 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Yea, I've never cut commercials and always depended on either the stvi or SageMC to auto skip.

Also, I've always used either Comskip or Show Analyzer. The old Show Analyzer is by far the most accurate. The new one, not so much. Most of that is due to the School House feature available in the old one and the tuning I was able to perform to make it dead-on accurate most of the time. Once the new Show Analyzer has School House I'm sure I can make it just as accurate.

Comskip is ok but it's slower, especially on H.264 video, and more difficult to tune correctly. I've actually stopped using Comskip for H.264 due to it's lack of speed and relative inaccuracy when compared to the new Show Analyzer. I still use the old Show Analyzer for my HDHR recordings because nothing beats it.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2009, 06:29 PM
bits bits is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taddeusz View Post
Yea, I've never cut commercials and always depended on either the stvi or SageMC to auto skip.

Also, I've always used either Comskip or Show Analyzer. The old Show Analyzer is by far the most accurate. The new one, not so much. Most of that is due to the School House feature available in the old one and the tuning I was able to perform to make it dead-on accurate most of the time. Once the new Show Analyzer has School House I'm sure I can make it just as accurate.

Comskip is ok but it's slower, especially on H.264 video, and more difficult to tune correctly. I've actually stopped using Comskip for H.264 due to it's lack of speed and relative inaccuracy when compared to the new Show Analyzer. I still use the old Show Analyzer for my HDHR recordings because nothing beats it.
Interesting comment regarding the old SA. I think had you had experience with actual confirmation of cut points on a frame accurate basis you probably would not be of the opinion that it was far more accurate. I did find SA to be quite accurate on certain shows but across a wide variety of shows/show types/channels ect it was not as dependable as comskip nor was it any faster. I did use SA for about a year before switching over to comskip and I have given SA numerous re-tries over the years.

I have not tried comskip on h264 nor SA since I am still in the land of mpeg and will be until I have no other option or when vrd and comskip catch up with it. I will check out the new SA in mean time.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2009, 09:14 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by bits View Post
Interesting comment regarding the old SA. I think had you had experience with actual confirmation of cut points on a frame accurate basis you probably would not be of the opinion that it was far more accurate. I did find SA to be quite accurate on certain shows but across a wide variety of shows/show types/channels ect it was not as dependable as comskip nor was it any faster. I did use SA for about a year before switching over to comskip and I have given SA numerous re-tries over the years.

I have not tried comskip on h264 nor SA since I am still in the land of mpeg and will be until I have no other option or when vrd and comskip catch up with it. I will check out the new SA in mean time.
I have always read that the edl time based cut points, which I use, are more accurate than the frame based cut points. Or am I mistaken?

Edit: Not to mention that the frame based cut points require a preset framerate. Not a problem if all your recordings are the same but if you have mixed 720p and 1080i recordings and set the comskip stvi to 29.97 your 720p recordings won't be right.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD

Last edited by Taddeusz; 12-30-2009 at 09:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Notifications of events on extenders and clients? tpboyce SageTV Studio 1 05-10-2009 07:24 PM
Comskip not auto skipping when watching TV jpaddock3000 SageTV Customizations 6 01-18-2008 12:18 AM
Comskip and Extenders Jesse SageTV Customizations 3 12-10-2007 12:03 PM
show analyzer / comskip on clients FidgetyRat SageTV Customizations 8 08-15-2006 04:31 PM
Comskip 3.011, gaps shown, not skipping e4gulf SageTV Customizations 13 10-22-2005 01:58 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.