![]() |
|
Hardware Support Discussions related to using various hardware setups with SageTV products. Anything relating to capture cards, remotes, infrared receivers/transmitters, system compatibility or other hardware related problems or suggestions should be posted here. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to know if this is possible?
Can I first have a ATX Pentium 4 MB with 5 PCI slots. In each PCI slot I put (5) Belkin Hi-speed USB 2.0 5-Port PCI Card. Then connect (4) WinTV-PVR-USB2 in each PCI board and (4) to the USB connectors on the MB? Can I have 24 tuners going at the same time? Then I could have (4) 250 GB IDE Drives and (6) 250 GB SATA Drives for a total of 2.5TB of Video. I would also get a 450 watt Large Power supply and MB that could handle atleast 4 IDE drives and 6 SATA drives. Maybe an Abit IC7-MAX3.... [FONT=courier new] Unit Price Amount Extended Price Intel Pentium 4 3.0GHz 800MHz 3GHz/512K/800MHz 478 pin $189 1 $189 Abit IC7-MAX3 $177 1 $177 Antec SX1040BII PC Case $119 1 $119 512MB PC3200 400Mhz DDR SDRAM 184pin memory $79 1 $79 Sapphire Radeon 9200SE 64MB DDR AGP 8X w/ CRT & TVO Video Card $40 1 $40 Maxtor 7Y250P0 250GB Ultra ATA133 7200RPM 8MB Hard Drive $234 4 $936 Belkin Hi-speed USB 2.0 5-Port PCI Card $45 5 $225 Maxtor 7Y250M0 250GB Serial ATA 7200RPM 8MB Hard Drive $249 6 $1,494 HAUPPAUGE 941,WINTV PVR USB2 $193 24 $4,620 $7,879 Last edited by medialivingroom; 04-07-2004 at 06:37 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I think that the PCI bus can keep up, but I would have concerns about the hard drive. It looks as if you could be recording 70+ GB/hr (or 24 MB/second). Considering that your HDD has, at best, an 8 MB cache I would bet that it would become the bottleneck.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So, you think that with all 24 tuners running and with 10 Hard Drives that Sage will not figure it out? What is I lowered the data rate to 1.8GB per hour (low DVD)? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Sure go for it and tells us how it works. I would go the other way, with an industrial SBC (Single Board computer) and put it in a 20 slot PCI backplane. It’s easier and cheap to do it this way.
try calling Jay or CS @ www.armorlink.com |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
SageTV will try to keep your HDDs equally empty. This means that if you have a 120 GB HDD and an 80 GB HDD, it will put 40 GB to the 120 before it starts to record to the 80. Since you will be deleting programs, it will be almost impossible to keep the drives balanced. EDIT: Slowing down to 1.8 GB/hr will result in 12+ MB/sec of writing. Last edited by fidget; 04-07-2004 at 06:59 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Oh even better, PX-20S3 with 18 PCI slot, then I can buy 18 ATI PCI TV Tuner Box, Model "E-HOME WONDER" at $64 each ![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
http://storagereview.com/php/benchmark/bench_sort.php Of course, if you need more performance, you could build a RAID array on one of these: http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata9000.asp 100MB/sec write, 400MB/sec should be plenty. Oh, and 1Gb of onboard ram wouldn't hurt either. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
This will not work. Too many streams and too much thrash for a smooth recording. The PCI bus on a normal PC can NOT handle 24 or whatever.
For this project you need a beefed up motherboard with 64 bit pci slots, and most likely dual processors, and a SCSI raid 5 array. You are looking in the 15k range when all said and done... |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is this possible (24 Tuners)???
Quote:
I... just ... can't... answer... seriously... Seriously though, I think that by the time you got all of those devices to work together SAGETV v3 will be fully deployed. ![]() ![]()
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
12 tuners would be possible by using 4 boxes, each with 3 PVR 250 cards, using Sage recorder and then a client machine. Would not be very expensive and it would allow 12 simultaneous shows all onto their own hard drives if needed.
Easy ![]() Patrick |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
fidgit> I don't know if you can sufficiently split your shows across the 10 HDDs.
Easy - stripe the 10 HDDs into a single Volume. Consider RAID-5, but I'd highly suggest a H/W RAID Card for RAID-5 (whereas RAID-0 a.k.a. simple striping only needs S/W RAID). stranger89> Modern HDDs (say those 200Gb+) are easily capable of transfer rates of over 50MB/sec,... That's not a sustained rate for "random" I/Os. That's for so-called sequential I/Os. Assuming Sage does 64KB writes, you might get somewhat closer to this than the worst-case figures listed for your chosen drives, however. Me, I think your real problem will be the drive channel(s) which you didn't explain. I might understand the 6 S-ATA drives as you can probably get a pretty good multi-channel S-ATA controller card. Don't know about your P-ATA performance to those 4 Ultra133 drives. Why am I concerned about this? Until S-ATA 2 (or SAS or Parallel SCSI or FibreChannel or iSCSI etc...), I/Os begun on a channel hog the channel until completed (see terms like "SCSI Disconnect"). You are going to need to either have a separate channel for each drive (S-ATA kinda solves that one) or use a drive connect which supports multiple outstanding I/Os active in order to achieve the high thru-put you desire. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Yeah, I know that's sequential, but it's not fully random either, 24MB/sec doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility.
As for channels, that's one of the great things about the 3ware cards, each drive has it's own channel. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I would also recommend a better power supply since I don't think 450w is enough to power the 10 drives.
Although I would think a RAID 5 solution would be the best and maybe some day Frey will enable choosing directories for each tuner to record to. I think many of us would like this feature. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
I agree on the power supply I have a 550w in my system with 7 hard drives and 3 PVR 250 cards. Also some one on the forums has 8 encoders running with out a problem. I don't remember if they have them all on the same box or not, but I know someone has 5 in one computer without a problem. A motherboard with onboard raid would help, especially if the raid controller controller is not on the PCI bus, but rather tied directly to the system bus that way on the PCI bus traffic is PVR 250 traffic and file I/O is on the system bus only.
__________________
SageTV 6.6, 100Mb LAN Living Room: WinXP Pro SP2, AMD XP3200+, 1GB, 1.3TB 3ware 9500S12 RAID5, GigaByte GA7N400Pro2, 2xVBOX USB2 HD Tuner<-Antennna, 1xHDHR<-Antennna , HD100 to HDMI Splitter 1080i->32" 4:3 HDTV or 1080i->92" 1080P LCD Projector Kitchen: WinXP Home SP2, Celeron 2.0Ghz, 512MB, 40GB, Saphire ATI MB, ATI9200->19"LCD 2 BedRooms: MediaMVP |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
First of all you not going be able get a backplane with more then 20 slot and 18 is MAX PCI slot you can have and you need Single Processor Single Board or Dual Processor Single Board or 2nd option would be a PCI Expansion Systems but keep in mind that where made for U Racks setup.
If I'am rigth the most you be able to get is up to 8 PCI tuner at MAX bit of 12MBit/sec wirte only to harddrive. Keep in mind that the PCI bus run at 127MBit/sec and reg IDE UDMA133 harddisk but IDE RAID on other hand may help becuase of the way it wirte data. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Actually the PCI bus is 32bit 33MHz so thats 1056000000 bits/sec or 126MBytes/sec.
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Nope stanger89 it really 32/8*33.3*1,000,000/1,048,576=127.2 MBytes/second
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Oops, forgot the .3, I was correcting that you said it was Bits/sec when it's Bytes/sec.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is this possible (24 Tuners)???
Quote:
Anyway, if you truly need 24 tuners, I would build 6 4-tuner systems. This way there are no bottlenecks, no device contention, IRQ or any issues. Get a super dirt cheap motherboard and CPU combo like one of the ECS boards with XP2100+ for like $69.99. Run cheap PC-2700 RAM. I bet with slower, run-of-the-mill compoennts you could build a nice little farm of 6 servers very cheap. Also consider the signal loss of 24 coax splits. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|