|
General Discussion General discussion about SageTV and related companies, products, and technologies. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Will Sage TV picture quality match my DVD recorder?
I want to upgrade my office PC to a PVR. I have Comcast cable and a Sony 27 inch analog CRT TV. I plan to stay analog and standard definition TV until my Sony TV dies. I would like to use the Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-500MCE card a Hauppauge MediaMVP.
The hardware specs on the office PC are good, should be no problem there. I basically only watch recorded TV and am currently accomplishing this with a couple of Panasonic DVD recorders using DVD RAM disks. My question to you is about the picture quality I can expect when I record TV through Sage and watch it on my analog CRT TV by way of the media extender. "Will the picture quality be as good as my DVD recorder output"? I forgot to mention that the DVD recorder playback quality is as good as watching live TV straight from the cable, which is very good as SDTV goes. Thanks Last edited by hogburgs; 06-18-2008 at 11:21 PM. Reason: forgot something |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
As long as you have all of your PQ settings in Sage set correctly, and as long as your capture card works well (I am not familiar with yours personally), you won't lose any quality "because of" Sage. So, yes... your picture quality should be as good as your DVD recorder.
Let's put it this way... Sage knocks HD out of the park (IMO )... so SD shouldn't be a problem.
__________________
Server: AMD Athlon II x4 635 2.9GHz, 8 Gb RAM, Win 10 x64, Java 8, Gigabit network Drives: Several TB of internal SATA and external USB drives, no NAS or RAID or such... Software: SageTV v9x64, stock STV with ADM. Tuners: 4 tuners via (2) HDHomeruns (100% OTA, DIY antennas in the attic). Clients: Several HD300s, HD200s, even an old HD100, all on wired LAN. Latest firmware for each. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't buy a MVP, though. Get the HD extender. It plays more formats natively, if nothing else.
No reason not to buy for the future. Matt
__________________
Server: Ubuntu 16.04 running Sage for Linux v9 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It really depends. I've found the TIB's (tuner in a box) that are found on PC tuner cards are quite poor when it comes to picture quality. My STB's produce a much better picture from the same signal. Of course this also depends on the signal quality you're receiving over your cable.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3 Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Hi,
Definitely go for the HD extender. My ATI tuners rival the picture from my D* STB's. I started with a pvr500 and it never produced what I would call great pq. Jesse
__________________
Server: Asus P5Q-EM DO, Q6600, 8 Gigs ram, WHS 2011, 1 HDHomerun(x2 OTA), 1 HD-PVR, 1 Colossus, V7.1.9 sage, 3.3 TB vid storage. HD100 X1 HD200 X2 HD300 X1 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Well you answered what was to be my next question. I wanted to be sure that the HD extender would work properly with my SDTV, I have my answer. Thanks.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have been fairly unhappy with my Hauppauge PVR-500MCE to tell the truth. I find the pq if an analog signal to be poor, and the PQ from SVID capture to be better but not as good as watching it through the Set Top Box.
I am watching it all on a 50' HD Plasma so I thing any issues are magnafied. When watching on my 32 SD tube TV (real old Magnavox). The PQ is ok, though analog captures are still not quite as good as SVID captures and it is all not as good as coming straight out of a STB. None of this is an issue with SageTV though, I feel the PVR-500 is not a great card. There are others that are supposed to be better. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yea, I've never been completely happy with the picture quality from my PVR 150's. Particularly the RF input. The Svideo is much better. I believe because SD video is has such a low resolution and that it's interlaced it doesn't take too well to being digitized. The video digitizer that Hauppauge uses also might not be the best in the world. Of course it's not supposed to be broadcast quality or anything.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3 Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
+1 on the comments about PQ on the Hauppauge 500/150 via RF. My HDHR produces a picture so much better than my 500 that even my wife notices, which is saying something. My ATI 550 falls somewhere between the two extremes.
I actually ended up pulling the PVR500 and it's collecting dust. I figure my HDHR and HD-PVR cover 90% of my recording duties and the ATI provides a safety net for the occasional overflow. PQ on both the HDHR and HD-PVR seem flawless to me, but I don't have a way of measuring it of course. It is hard to imagine someone watching those recordings and being unhappy with the picture, though. Tim
__________________
Server: WHS, Phenom 9150e Quad-Core, 2.0TB for recordings (pooled). HD-PVR (w/USB-UIRT), HDHR, ATI550. Clients: HD200 (wired), HD100 (wireless via Netgear WNHDEB111). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I personally find that my ATI 550pro's after a good high quality cable amp, look very close to dvd quality on SDTVs, on HDTVs it is a little more noticeable.... I also to am able to see the difference even in SD Digital channels coming off the HDHRs even on the SDTVs...... I would check signal strength in your cable modem to start with, just to get an idea of how your line is....
__________________
Rackmount 20 drive hotswap case, 2x Intel e5410 Xeons, 4GB FBDIMM, 1x 80GB (OS), 14x 1TB in raid 5(DATA!!), Aerca 1280DML, Server 2k3 Enterprise x64 R2. Sage 6.4.8 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I did it!
I have my system installed.
SageTv vr.6.3 HD media extender Hauppauge PVR-500 MCE All I can say is wow! The picture quality is, on a scale of 1-10, an 11+ !!! I'm so glad I went this route, Sage rocks! |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Congrats, gladd you're happy.
All the reviews I had seen had put the ATI cards as having some of the best PQ of a tuner card, but you sure did pay for it. But as everyone has said it depends a lot on your input signal. My 1600 does well enough on analog for me. Since I watch through an HD set it's never going to rival HD PQ, but the stations that don't work well are due to the signal and not the card. Of course it's all subjective and I'm probably not as picky as some.
__________________
Server: Core 2 Duo E4200 2 GB RAM, nVidia 6200LE, 480 GB in pool, 500GB WHS backup drive, 1x750 GB & 1x1TB Sage drives, Hauppage HVR-1600, HD PVR, Windows Home Server SP2 Media center: 46" Samsung DLP, HD-100 extender. Gaming: Intel Core2 Duo E7300, 4GB RAM, ATI HD3870, Intel X-25M G2 80GB SSD, 200 & 120 GB HDD, 23" Dell LCD, Windows 7 Home Premium. Laptop: HP dm3z, AMD (1.6 GHz) 4 GB RAM, 60 GB OCZ SSD, AMD HD3200 graphics, 13.3" widescreen LCD, Windows 7 x64/Sage placeshifter. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sage DVD player skipping chapters randomly | pratt733 | SageTV Software | 0 | 03-12-2007 01:08 PM |
DVD playback error in Sage v6 | Chroner | SageTV Software | 21 | 03-10-2007 05:56 AM |
Theater 650 and picture quality problems | sunray | Hardware Support | 3 | 01-18-2007 07:40 PM |
DVD thru Sage | paulbeers | Hardware Support | 6 | 03-03-2006 12:40 PM |
Picture quality not so great - using PVR150MCE & Sage | cloudeleven | SageTV Software | 7 | 03-27-2005 11:28 PM |