SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > Hardware Support > Hardware Support
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

Hardware Support Discussions related to using various hardware setups with SageTV products. Anything relating to capture cards, remotes, infrared receivers/transmitters, system compatibility or other hardware related problems or suggestions should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:43 PM
mpegripper mpegripper is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 29
cpu requirements for hd

hey guys,

i noticed that sage 4 says you need at least a 3ghz processor for hd content. what about if you are using a socket 939 amd 64 bit. what do u need?

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:56 PM
bhyman1 bhyman1 is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 347
I've played HD back successfully using A64 3000+ and 3200+ processors.

Those numbers are supposed to indicate what they are equivalent to in terms of an Intel chip. So a 3000+ would be 3.0Ghz and a 3200+ would be 3.2Ghz.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2005, 07:34 AM
paulbeers paulbeers is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,550
With a decent video card, you should be able to use less than a 3 gig proc too. I used a sempron 2800+ (1.6 gig) and was able to get flawless playback with a geforce 6600. It is what I currently use.
__________________
Sage Server: AMD Athlon II 630, Asrock 785G motherboard, 3GB of RAM, 500GB OS HD in RAID 1 and 2 - 750GB Recording Drives, HDHomerun, Avermedia HD Duet & 2-HDPVRs, and 9.0TB storage in RAID 5 via Dell Perc 5i for DVD storage
Source: Clear QAM and OTA for locals, 2-DishNetwork VIP211's
Clients: 2 Sage HD300's, 2 Sage HD200's, 2 Sage HD100's, 1 MediaMVP, and 1 Placeshifter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2005, 08:59 AM
Mike Young Mike Young is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 287
It also makes a difference what decoder you are using, my 2.4ghz /6800GT OC is pretty much unusable with the Sage Decoder, but is perfect with the Nvidia decoder. (CPU with Sage decoder 90-100% vs 50-60% with Nvidia)

mike/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2005, 11:22 AM
GbrNole GbrNole is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 844
i use an xp3000+ (2.06ghz) and a 6600gt - no problems!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2005, 06:48 PM
paulbeers paulbeers is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,550
I agree with Mike....codecs realllllyyy matter. I use Cyberlink codecs and no problems. I think the Nvidia ones are better (at least that seems to be the consensus), but unfortunately I haven't paid for them so I don't use them!
__________________
Sage Server: AMD Athlon II 630, Asrock 785G motherboard, 3GB of RAM, 500GB OS HD in RAID 1 and 2 - 750GB Recording Drives, HDHomerun, Avermedia HD Duet & 2-HDPVRs, and 9.0TB storage in RAID 5 via Dell Perc 5i for DVD storage
Source: Clear QAM and OTA for locals, 2-DishNetwork VIP211's
Clients: 2 Sage HD300's, 2 Sage HD200's, 2 Sage HD100's, 1 MediaMVP, and 1 Placeshifter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2005, 07:30 PM
jptaz's Avatar
jptaz jptaz is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Detroit Michigan
Posts: 991
I personally use NVDVD 2.55 (Old Nvidia Decoders) to playback sample 1080i Max bit rate samples on an AMD 2000+ with an FX 5200 using overlay mode and it only uses 50% CPU. On my AMND 3200+ with a 6600GT card it hardly hits 30% with overlay using the same old NVDVD codec.

Frankly I have tried different combininations of NVidia Drivers with the new PureVideo Decoders with my 6600GT and found it to be absolute CRAP. Even using Overlay I get playback problems with the Pure Video Decoders. The old NVDVD 2.55 Decoders can playback better than the new ones even using VMR9.

How did NVidia manage to make new decoders perform worse than the old ones on there own hardware with the recommended Driver level?

John
__________________
SageTV 6.6, 100Mb LAN
Living Room: WinXP Pro SP2, AMD XP3200+, 1GB, 1.3TB 3ware 9500S12 RAID5, GigaByte GA7N400Pro2, 2xVBOX USB2 HD Tuner<-Antennna, 1xHDHR<-Antennna , HD100 to HDMI Splitter 1080i->32" 4:3 HDTV or 1080i->92" 1080P LCD Projector
Kitchen: WinXP Home SP2, Celeron 2.0Ghz, 512MB, 40GB, Saphire ATI MB, ATI9200->19"LCD
2 BedRooms: MediaMVP
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-13-2005, 05:31 PM
naln's Avatar
naln naln is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 236
Couple of things from my experience-

I run a sage server with AverHD card....its a XP2100 with 512DDR and 4 other capture cards plugged into it....(I cannot watch HD on it )

I was using routine IDE drives for sage- and had stutters and problems viewing HD on a client (AMD 64 XP3000+, 1G DDR, 6600GT)- then I put in SATA drives with striping- and viewing on the client is flawless.....and- nvidia codecs work best for me.

So I think you may not need much CPU HP for recording- but maybe significant for rendering- that said- I typically use about 20 to 25% CPU power while watching HD on my client setup.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.