SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV Products > SageTV Software
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Software Discussion related to the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. relating to the SageTV software application should be posted here. (Check the descriptions of the other forums; all hardware related questions go in the Hardware Support forum, etc. And, post in the customizations forum instead if any customizations are active.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2005, 11:45 AM
tiburon451 tiburon451 is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6
Are any SageTV releases as stable as 2.0?

I've been considering upgrading my Sage 2.0 client/server configuration that has been very reliable for 6 months to 2.1 or higher to investigate using the MVP client. My current configuration took a significant amount of time to fine tune, and I don't want to make a Sage upgrade my new life's work. Reliabiity is my number 1 concern. Reading these and other Sage forums suggests that 2.1 is less reliable than 2.0, and all of the betas have their own problems; particularly tearing, remote problems, general headaches. My current system rarely crashes; I don't want to have the same problems I had when first configuring this system just to try some new features. Honest advice from the experts, not just spin, would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-23-2005, 12:11 PM
mdmint's Avatar
mdmint mdmint is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vancouver, WA USofA
Posts: 877
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiburon451
I've been considering upgrading my Sage 2.0 client/server configuration that has been very reliable for 6 months to 2.1 or higher to investigate using the MVP client. My current configuration took a significant amount of time to fine tune, and I don't want to make a Sage upgrade my new life's work. Reliabiity is my number 1 concern. Reading these and other Sage forums suggests that 2.1 is less reliable than 2.0, and all of the betas have their own problems; particularly tearing, remote problems, general headaches. My current system rarely crashes; I don't want to have the same problems I had when first configuring this system just to try some new features. Honest advice from the experts, not just spin, would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
I understand the feeling and didn't immediately go to 2.1.10 when it came out either. The desire to try Cayars STV and Webserver finally got me to make the upgrade. I don't recall when I did go to 2.1.10 but I have not experienced the problems many have. Not sure why. Server was rock solid before running 2.x and still is rock solid running 2.1.10 (running in service mode, which I like). All three Clients working fine too.

I would/did of course make complete backup of Sage dir before making the upgrade just in case I wanted to easily go back. (Plus ghosted whole partition just in case it all went South) I have not upgraded to a 2.2.x beta and don't plan to, see no reason/benefit at this time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-23-2005, 12:42 PM
Cayars Cayars is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,029
I WAS one of the people who had BAD troubles with 2.1. I'm now running 2.2.4 and it runs just about as good as 2.0 did on my computers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.