|
SageTV Beta Test Software Discussion related to BETA Releases of the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. regarding SageTV Beta Releases should be posted here. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I think I will post this as a separate thread as well...
To fix this edit the SAGETV.INI file in the remote wonder software directory. For me this directory was: C:\PROGRAM FILES\ATI MULTIMEDIA\REMCTRL\PLUG-INS Search for: SageTvWinClass=sage.d Change it to: SageTvWinClass=sage.s Close and save the file. Close and restart the ATI Remote Wonder software. Everything should work fine after that. Jason Bottjen Quote:
Last edited by JasonJoel; 10-14-2004 at 05:14 PM. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
are you sure ? I did not do a clean install |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
An upgrade install will use your old settings; a new install will use the default settings.
- Andy
__________________
SageTV Open Source v9 is available. - Read the SageTV FAQ. Older PDF User's Guides mostly still apply: SageTV V7.0 & SageTV Studio v7.1. - Hauppauge remote help: 1) Basics/Extending it 2) Replace it 3) Use it w/o needing focus - HD Extenders: A) FAQs B) URC MX-700 remote setup Note: This is a users' forum; see the Rules. For official tech support fill out a Support Request. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
well I did not know it was default
but that does not mean the blue backgrounds should be ditched for overlay, does it ? |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
I found if you set the rendering to Default, the blue backgrounds come back on Overlay
__________________
Mike Janer SageTV HD300 Extender X2 Sage Server: AMD X4 620,2048MB RAM,SageTV 7.x ,2X HDHR Primes, 2x HDHomerun(original). 80GB OS Drive, Video Drives: Local 2TB Drive GB RAID5 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
The only issue I see with the "Default" rendering mode
The Aspect Ratio Mode does not change anything. It appears that what every is being played is displayed in the source aspect ratio, ignoring the settings of the Aspect Ratio Mode. I really like the Fill mode. I think this needs to get fixed and I will be using default mode on all my clients except my high end (which I run VMR9).
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
ukmgranger ,
I have the same problem with black and white and sound distortion. The terrestrial channels are OK though. It looks like SageTV tries to process the composite input signal as NTSC rather than PAL that we use here in Europe. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
but it looks much better than before |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Lucas,
I think you are on to something there! I should of thuoght about the NTSC thing. Do you know of a way to change it, or is it for Frey to sort? |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Overlay with colour keying=disabled gives some problems for me with only partial backgrounds being shown (which looks horrible) (see attached screenshots with re-coloured backgrounds)... I thought it was just a problem with my DirectX getting messed up, and needing a windows reinstall, because nobody else was seeing it... Is this what you are seeing? (Mike, 'Default'=Overlay on all windows versions except WinXp... On XP, 'Default'=VMR7, which is probably why it looks different... Unfortunately my system is Win2k, and I can't run VMR9!) |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
the first one is cause they removed the blue grounds for overlay
like mike said you can still get the blue backgrounds but only with VMR7 "default render" and of course the transparent blue ones with VMR9 they just need to put them back in at least I hope they will it is really hard to read with clear backgrounds and VMR9 is too hard on most of our computers VMR7 is much better but overlay is so much sharper still and the only difference is now you cannot get the blue background for the menus so you get no VMR7 at all nielm? thats weird you can do VMR9, just not well not enough yet VMR7 which would run fine you cannot do how weak and yes I see the same thing for when it is disabled with overlay rendering |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
ukmgranger,
only had 2.1 running for 30mins before going to work this morning. I reverted back 2.0.20. I took a look in the properties files but couldnt see anything amiss. country code etc were proper. So, I guess, since colour is OK with tv tuner channels, that it is a bug. In the US they wouldn't have noticed because of NTSC. I would have thought that some european users would have already tested the closed group betas. Then again I may be wrong and it maybe a simple config change.......... |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
I'm also using a EPIA M10000, and have the same overlay bug. I didn't try any of the changes here yet to see if I can get them back, since the machine is at home (and for some reason today I can't get to it with VNC). Mine's running a stripped down version of XP, but if I choose VMR9, I get a video error when I try to use livetv or something recorded.
I like the fact the the UI and the recording capabilities of the server have been seperated, I don't have to worry as much about the kiddies crashing the system (at least I hope not).
__________________
Server: AMD Phenom 2 920 2.8ghz Quad, 16gb Ram, 4tb Storage, 1xHVR-2250, 1 Ceton Cable Card adapter, Windows 7 SP1 |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Switch for PAL
Quote:
mmc/video_format_code=8 Not sure if this helps with your problems though. -Matt |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Been following this post here. I have been without my PC for the past week but am going to get it back Saturday. I intend to upgrade to the newer version of Sage and want to know if anyone has any advise on preperation before I do this. Any problems with it and the Neilm STV? Any known problems with it and any versions of Java? Any problems so far with certain hardware? Inquiring minds wanna know.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
DrDivx won't encode if SageTV Service Running.
Has anyone else seen this? DrDivx (1.06) will not encode (either batch or foreground) on the same machine if SageTV is running as a service. It immediately fails, no error code.
I have no problems running it on a SageTV Client box. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|