|
SageTV Customizations This forums is for discussing and sharing user-created modifications for the SageTV application created by using the SageTV Studio or through the use of external plugins. Use this forum to discuss customizations for SageTV version 6 and earlier, or for the SageTV3 UI. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#621
|
||||
|
||||
What is this 2 pass setting you guys are talking about? I can't seem to find it in the ini.
|
#622
|
||||
|
||||
It is two_pass_logo in the ini file.
Remember that not all possible settings are in the ini file. Only the ones that you want to override the default settings. Jere
__________________
Death to commercials!!! Latest ShowAnalyzer Beta version: 0.9.7
Last edited by Jere_Jones; 11-27-2004 at 09:56 PM. |
#623
|
||||
|
||||
so you are saying that two_pass_logo defaults to true?
|
#624
|
||||
|
||||
Yep.
Jere
__________________
Death to commercials!!! Latest ShowAnalyzer Beta version: 0.9.7
|
#625
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I assume you would save the profiles as .ini files. I would save them with a name such as showname.ini, e.g. - if the filename were TheWireSlapstick-984007-0.mpg comskip would save a TheWire.ini. It would be chosen for any episode of The Wire. Another idea. Perhaps it would create 2 .ini's. A showname.ini and a channel.ini that had information specific to a channel such as logo descriptions. Quote:
This isn't well-formed yet but i would think that I would want it a lot easier for the user than editing .ini files. Maybe this little part could be handled by an STV? A setup page that lets you tell comskip that the 3rd commercial break started ~15 sec. too soon or the 4th show segment had a commercial that was not detected and it was at ~43m 30s. Comskip would then re-analyze the video learning from the feedback and then adjusting the show and channel .ini's. It doesn't hurt to dream Keep up the great work, I'm looking forward to seeing your new version when it is released. I can see the paypal orders streaming in BTW, how should we refer to the new version? I assume its name will be different than the open source comskip.exe Last edited by sleonard; 11-28-2004 at 02:02 AM. |
#626
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Because of this I was wondering if it is possible to not use other detection techniques and get ComSkip to run even faster while still keeping the accuracy. As an example, how important is logo detection when you have CC data? If I were to try and not use certain detection mechanism, which are the most time consuming/process intensive as far as ComSkip is concerned? |
#627
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Are you running the 0.64 I posted last night? That version should solve a lot of the speed problems with livetv=1. Jere
__________________
Death to commercials!!! Latest ShowAnalyzer Beta version: 0.9.7
|
#628
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Whatcha think Jere?
__________________
Warm Regards, Andy Kruta A+, CNA, MCSA, Network+, RHCE "It's kinda fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney |
#629
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
However, I've been wrong before. Do you have any references I can check out? Jere
__________________
Death to commercials!!! Latest ShowAnalyzer Beta version: 0.9.7
|
#630
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This is why filters such as FFDSHOW don't work withMPEG2 decoders when hardware accelleration is enabled. |
#631
|
||||
|
||||
I'm running the pvr350 and currently enjoy about 3-10% usage during live TV watching on my underclocked amd 2600+. I haven't tried the RT comskip yet because krutaw's vbscript has been so great. My system only needs a 2hr window to mark commercials on all of my recorded programs for the day. I might give this a try today, but I'm expecting a huge increase in my CPU usage as comskip will be decoding the stream in addition to the 350. I'll post my results anyway though.
|
#632
|
||||
|
||||
What does the latest setting "livetv=X" do. It isn't listed on the wiki pages yet.
Thanks, Scott |
#633
|
|||
|
|||
This setting allows Comskip to write out the txt file while it's still processing the file. This allows an STV to use the file as it's being generated (real-time). The STV needs to be written to do this and to keep updating the timeline.
|
#634
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#635
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
-AJ Last edited by ajuhawk; 12-01-2004 at 05:13 PM. |
#636
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Jere
__________________
Death to commercials!!! Latest ShowAnalyzer Beta version: 0.9.7
|
#637
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
could you tell me what number to use for detection method if I want to use all technique except for CC? (my source doesn't have CC) I can't figure out the math logic involved: detect_method - a sum of the detection methods to be used (1 - 255): -- 1 = black frame detection -- 2 = logo detection -- 4 = scene change rate monitoring -- 8 = fuzzy logic -- 16 = closed captioning -- 32 = aspect ration So AR (32) + FUZZY LOGIC (8) + SCENE DETECT (4) + LOGO (2) + BLACK FRAME (1) = 47?? why is everything 255?? |
#638
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#639
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
In your case you should still be able to use 255 and not have to single out the CC data. If CC data isn't in the file, it won't be used. |
#640
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
Code:
255 = 0xFF = 11111111b 11111111b basically means: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Black Frame | | | | | | --- Logo Detection | | | | | ----- Scene Changes | | | | ------- Fuzzy Logic | | | --------- Closed Captioning | | ----------- Aspect Ratio | ------------- Reserved for future use --------------- Reserved for future use Since you don't want to use Closed captioning, you should change the Closed captioning bit to a 0 and get 11101111b which is equal to 239 or since the leftmost 2 bits aren't used yet you could also go with 00101111b which (as you discovered) is 47. The end result: using detect_method=239 or detect_method=47 will give you the same results. Of course you could also ignore this entire post and do exactly what you did that already gave you the correct setting. Did that help or just confuse you more? Jere
__________________
Death to commercials!!! Latest ShowAnalyzer Beta version: 0.9.7
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|