SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > SageTV BETA Release Products > SageTV Beta Test Software
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

SageTV Beta Test Software Discussion related to BETA Releases of the SageTV application produced by SageTV. Questions, issues, problems, suggestions, etc. regarding SageTV Beta Releases should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2006, 10:19 PM
popechild popechild is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 725
Two transcoding questions

1. Is it possible for the transcoding to happen on a separate machine? ie. Can I setup a networked machine (using Client perhaps, or just using SageTVTrancoder) to do the processing work so it doesn't affect my tv playback while I transcode? Kind of like how you can setup commercial processing on another machine...

2. Is it possible to modify any of the settings for the specific format options? Or even to add new ones? I ask because the Ipod format is giving me the best quality/size mixture (I can't get mpeg4 to work) for what I need, but it's reformatting all of my 16x9 material to 4x3 (or something similar to that). Is it possible to change this option to retain the original aspect ratio?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-12-2006, 01:59 AM
rickgillyon's Avatar
rickgillyon rickgillyon is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Whitley Bay, England
Posts: 1,950
Don't know about 2, but on 1 Narflex said that it's not currently possible to move transcoding to another server. It shouldn't interfere with viewing etc. as it runs below normal priority.

I do my transcoding on another server with an automatic overnight job or right-click menu on the files for immediate transcode, works very well. There's a thread about it on here somewhere...
__________________
unRAID Server: Intel Core i5 7600K, 48GB DDR4, 2x512GB PCIe M.2 Cache Pool, 2x10TB SATA3 Parity Drive, 3x8TB SATA Array, 1x hdHomeRun DVB-T2 Quattro, IPTV via xTeVe, unRAID 6.8.3, tvHeadEnd for recording back end, Emby
Clients: 3 Nvidia Shields, 3 FireTV, 3 Win10 Pro PC Clients
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-12-2006, 06:02 AM
blade blade is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by popechild
2. Is it possible to modify any of the settings for the specific format options? Or even to add new ones?
Yes, they can be edited in the Sage properties file and new ones can be created.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:13 AM
Goodspike's Avatar
Goodspike Goodspike is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickgillyon
Don't know about 2, but on 1 Narflex said that it's not currently possible to move transcoding to another server. It shouldn't interfere with viewing etc. as it runs below normal priority.
On my machine it takes up all available CPU cycles, when doing apparently nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-12-2006, 09:37 AM
popechild popechild is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickgillyon
Don't know about 2, but on 1 Narflex said that it's not currently possible to move transcoding to another server. It shouldn't interfere with viewing etc. as it runs below normal priority.

I do my transcoding on another server with an automatic overnight job or right-click menu on the files for immediate transcode, works very well. There's a thread about it on here somewhere...
Yes, I think I've seen that thread, but if I remember correctly that's using a third party app for the transcoding, right? It may just be that I'm not setting the properties correctly, but I've never been able to get a third party app to get anywhere near the speeds of what the Sage transcoder is giving me, and for now at least, I'm fine with the Sage quality.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:38 AM
rickgillyon's Avatar
rickgillyon rickgillyon is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Whitley Bay, England
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodspike
On my machine it takes up all available CPU cycles, when doing apparently nothing.
Yes, it should take all available, but should allow Sage/Service to operate normally. If it doesn't, there's a problem with it!
__________________
unRAID Server: Intel Core i5 7600K, 48GB DDR4, 2x512GB PCIe M.2 Cache Pool, 2x10TB SATA3 Parity Drive, 3x8TB SATA Array, 1x hdHomeRun DVB-T2 Quattro, IPTV via xTeVe, unRAID 6.8.3, tvHeadEnd for recording back end, Emby
Clients: 3 Nvidia Shields, 3 FireTV, 3 Win10 Pro PC Clients
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-12-2006, 10:40 AM
rickgillyon's Avatar
rickgillyon rickgillyon is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Whitley Bay, England
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by popechild
Yes, I think I've seen that thread, but if I remember correctly that's using a third party app for the transcoding, right?
Yes, uses AutoGK mainly. Processing overnight so speed's rarely an issue for me, my rig manages about 30fps XViD transcoding.
__________________
unRAID Server: Intel Core i5 7600K, 48GB DDR4, 2x512GB PCIe M.2 Cache Pool, 2x10TB SATA3 Parity Drive, 3x8TB SATA Array, 1x hdHomeRun DVB-T2 Quattro, IPTV via xTeVe, unRAID 6.8.3, tvHeadEnd for recording back end, Emby
Clients: 3 Nvidia Shields, 3 FireTV, 3 Win10 Pro PC Clients
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-12-2006, 11:08 AM
Goodspike's Avatar
Goodspike Goodspike is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickgillyon
Yes, it should take all available, but should allow Sage/Service to operate normally. If it doesn't, there's a problem with it!
I have another thread on it, but it first interferes sometimes with Sage being restarted. If I Ctrl-Alt-Del and terminate it, Sage will then restart.

But as an experiment last night I terminated it with Sage running. Going from the recorded programs menu to a recorded program was much faster, and everything else was much more crisp.

I'm not exactly sure this thing does anything for me. If it allows the TS or TP files created by my MyHD card to be played in Sage, that would be something useful (but not 100% necessary), but other than that, I don't see that it does a thing. I'd rather not have it if there's a choice. I don't care about thumbnails at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.