SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > Hardware Support > Hardware Support
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

Hardware Support Discussions related to using various hardware setups with SageTV products. Anything relating to capture cards, remotes, infrared receivers/transmitters, system compatibility or other hardware related problems or suggestions should be posted here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2005, 07:38 AM
JUC's Avatar
JUC JUC is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 1,399
New HDTV in the near future-questions!

Hi all, I am about ready to take the plunge and purchase a HDTV. I am leaning towards a 32" LCD over a Plasma (if you think I should go Plasma please chime in with reasons!). Here's the dilemma. I am worried about how my picture quality will be (isn't everyone!!). I do have DirecTV so my source will be good. I do not plan at this time to purchase their HDTV programming (but may in the future once additional channels are supported). So, I will be spending lots of money on a HDTV but will mostly be using it for SDTV content provided by DirecTV. No OTA options either. I know that if I went with a bigger HDTV the quality may be noticeably worse but how about on a 32". Anyone else out there driving 32" LCD's without HDTV programming? Any help, recommendations would be appreciated.
Thanks
JUC
__________________
Server: Athlon 2000XP; 1GB Kingston Ram; 250GB Seagate; 160GB Seagate; 160GB Western Digital; Lite-on DVD player; Hauppauge Rosyln; Hauppauge PVR-150; ATI AIW 7500; Actisys 200L; running stock v5 .stv


Client: MVP Extender running SageMC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:06 AM
JasonJoel JasonJoel is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,043
I have a 27" LCD I mainly use SDTV for...


And I can say it looks a LOT worse than you would think. Can you get used to it? Sure. But will you ever be as happy with it as a SD analog TV? No.

It does help that you will have DirecTV. But it will still be noticeable.

Jason

Quote:
Originally Posted by JUC
Hi all, I am about ready to take the plunge and purchase a HDTV. I am leaning towards a 32" LCD over a Plasma (if you think I should go Plasma please chime in with reasons!). Here's the dilemma. I am worried about how my picture quality will be (isn't everyone!!). I do have DirecTV so my source will be good. I do not plan at this time to purchase their HDTV programming (but may in the future once additional channels are supported). So, I will be spending lots of money on a HDTV but will mostly be using it for SDTV content provided by DirecTV. No OTA options either. I know that if I went with a bigger HDTV the quality may be noticeably worse but how about on a 32". Anyone else out there driving 32" LCD's without HDTV programming? Any help, recommendations would be appreciated.
Thanks
JUC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:17 AM
Naylia's Avatar
Naylia Naylia is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 754
Well, spend some time over at AVS Forums and you'll see that the general consesnus seems to be that you will get a better picture with plasma...problem is with plasma you have to go with a 50" to get square pixels (vs. those darned rectangular ones).

But to be honest, I'd stick that money in the bank and grow it some more and wait until you have at least some HD content before purchasing. Get an XBox360 to use with it or do you do a lot of other stuff on your PC that would justify it?
__________________
You can find me at Missing Remote. Or playing FF XIV. For XLobby users: XLobby MC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:18 AM
JUC's Avatar
JUC JUC is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 1,399
damn....any advantages with Plasma's? What about forgetting the HDTV's and going for an EDTV---I could then get a 42" Plasma EDTV--would the picture quality improve with that? May not be futureproof but maybe give me a better picture quality today. I don't know. I just want a bigger TV with good quality. What is everyone doing? My 24" 7yo RCA piece of junk with coaxial input just isn't cutting it anymore.
Thanks
JUC

edit, didn't see the previous post....no, I want a bigger TV today!! no waiting.
__________________
Server: Athlon 2000XP; 1GB Kingston Ram; 250GB Seagate; 160GB Seagate; 160GB Western Digital; Lite-on DVD player; Hauppauge Rosyln; Hauppauge PVR-150; ATI AIW 7500; Actisys 200L; running stock v5 .stv


Client: MVP Extender running SageMC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:19 AM
cummings66 cummings66 is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Moberly, MO
Posts: 281
I agree that SD on an HD display will look much worse than you would expect it to. Now if your display isn't a true HD display it might look pretty good.

It doesn't matter if it's plasma or LCD or DLP. SD content just looks worse on a display that can show you the details.

You will get used to it however.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:20 AM
JUC's Avatar
JUC JUC is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 1,399
so maybe an EDTV might give better picture quality for SD content?
__________________
Server: Athlon 2000XP; 1GB Kingston Ram; 250GB Seagate; 160GB Seagate; 160GB Western Digital; Lite-on DVD player; Hauppauge Rosyln; Hauppauge PVR-150; ATI AIW 7500; Actisys 200L; running stock v5 .stv


Client: MVP Extender running SageMC
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:37 AM
paulbeers paulbeers is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,550
If you are really serious about upgrading now, I would not recommend buying EDTV unless you have money just floating around and don't care about throwing this tv out in the near future. If you are going to spend the money, they buy an HDTV and deal with the limited picture quality of SD on HDTV (it isn't that it is SDTV on an HDTV television that is the problem, it is that SDTV is just so low res on ANY big tv it is not going to show you the quality you want). Big televisions are what is pushing HDTV. The picture just doesn't look nice on any big tv unless it is higher res. The example I like to give, is I have a travel 9" screen. It looks crystal clear due to the small size it really compacts the pixels. If you compare that to my 27 SDTV, the image actually looks worse because now those pixels are much more spread out. Buy HDTV if you are going to buy LCD or DLP or Plasma. You will be unhappy in about a year or two when you make the HDTV plunge and your image does not live up to what you want if you buy EDTV.
__________________
Sage Server: AMD Athlon II 630, Asrock 785G motherboard, 3GB of RAM, 500GB OS HD in RAID 1 and 2 - 750GB Recording Drives, HDHomerun, Avermedia HD Duet & 2-HDPVRs, and 9.0TB storage in RAID 5 via Dell Perc 5i for DVD storage
Source: Clear QAM and OTA for locals, 2-DishNetwork VIP211's
Clients: 2 Sage HD300's, 2 Sage HD200's, 2 Sage HD100's, 1 MediaMVP, and 1 Placeshifter
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:39 AM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUC
so maybe an EDTV might give better picture quality for SD content?
Probably not, see with an SDTV, the interlaced nature of the display (including broad beam size, overlapping beams, low resolving power) mask most of the problems of SD, thus you can't tell how bad it is.

Now with a "digital" display (HD or ED) it can fully resolve every pixels sent to it (for SD at least) thus you can plainly see all the deficiencies.

Now with what little I've seen of DTV, it should look pretty good, it shouldn't be noisy or fuzzy, but it will look rather soft.

My advice to you would be to invest in a Geforce 6 series, and the nVidia "PureVideo" decoders, as you'll want the best deinterlacing you can get.

As for display choice, about the only advantage of a Plasma is the size, I wouldn't worry about it too much. You could get a nice DLP for pretty cheap these days. Plus they're much more PC friendly than a CRT (which run 1080i).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:42 AM
JUC's Avatar
JUC JUC is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 1,399
well, any idea on the time frame to get most programming in HD? If it is a few years out for DTV--then by the time that comes around, i can purchase another HDTV when that comes and move the one I purchase now to my bedroom or something. If its more like next year, then obviously I woudn't want to waste my money. Anyone use a larger EDTV set--how's the quality?
Thanks
JUC
__________________
Server: Athlon 2000XP; 1GB Kingston Ram; 250GB Seagate; 160GB Seagate; 160GB Western Digital; Lite-on DVD player; Hauppauge Rosyln; Hauppauge PVR-150; ATI AIW 7500; Actisys 200L; running stock v5 .stv


Client: MVP Extender running SageMC
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:45 AM
JUC's Avatar
JUC JUC is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 1,399
okay, what about if I wasn't using a computer for this--so it removes the interlacing/deinterllacing issues---just hooking it up directly from DTV to the TV?
__________________
Server: Athlon 2000XP; 1GB Kingston Ram; 250GB Seagate; 160GB Seagate; 160GB Western Digital; Lite-on DVD player; Hauppauge Rosyln; Hauppauge PVR-150; ATI AIW 7500; Actisys 200L; running stock v5 .stv


Client: MVP Extender running SageMC
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:45 AM
night night is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 36
watching regular tv on a monitor is some ugly sh*t.
and plasma is a limited life and can burn in
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:46 AM
JasonJoel JasonJoel is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,043
To be honest, if it were me, I would get a CRT based HDTV if I were you. That is unless you REALLY need the space recudtion a digital will give you.

You get very good SD picture, and a darn good HDTV picture in the future. The only think you really give up is a little HD clarity (not much if you look at a DLP/LCD/Plasma versus CRT side by side) and the size/weight.

Think about it...

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:48 AM
JUC's Avatar
JUC JUC is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 1,399
unfortunately, size does matter! My wife has only given me "permiission" to purchase a Plasma/LCD. I think the DLP's are too expensive for me right now.
JUC
__________________
Server: Athlon 2000XP; 1GB Kingston Ram; 250GB Seagate; 160GB Seagate; 160GB Western Digital; Lite-on DVD player; Hauppauge Rosyln; Hauppauge PVR-150; ATI AIW 7500; Actisys 200L; running stock v5 .stv


Client: MVP Extender running SageMC
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-17-2005, 09:50 AM
stanger89's Avatar
stanger89 stanger89 is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Marion, IA
Posts: 15,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUC
well, any idea on the time frame to get most programming in HD? If it is a few years out for DTV--then by the time that comes around, i can purchase another HDTV when that comes and move the one I purchase now to my bedroom or something. If its more like next year, then obviously I woudn't want to waste my money.
It will be years, lots of stuff (pre-HD era shows) will never be HD, but right now, most new shows, especially those on the larger networks, are HD.

Quote:
Anyone use a larger EDTV set--how's the quality?
Thanks
JUC
The bigger you go, the more pixels you need regardless of your source. I'd say if you get into the 40"+ size range you'll need at least 480p (scanlines are horrible) and probably want at least 720p.

Quote:
okay, what about if I wasn't using a computer for this--so it removes the interlacing/deinterllacing issues---just hooking it up directly from DTV to the TV?
It doesn't eliminate the issues, it just forces them upon the TV, you still need good deinterlacing.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-17-2005, 10:36 AM
White94Cobra's Avatar
White94Cobra White94Cobra is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUC
unfortunately, size does matter! My wife has only given me "permiission" to purchase a Plasma/LCD. I think the DLP's are too expensive for me right now.
JUC
Aren't DLP's typically less expensive than Plasma or LCD? I've been considering a DLP simply because I could get a 55"+ DLP for the price of a 42" Plasma. I'm waiting for the 1080p Samsung DLP to become widely available.

OK... I'm actually waiting for my wife to give in, but it sounds better to say I'm waiting for a new product.

In the mean time I've moved my Fusion 5 card to my main PC, installed MCE 2005, and am "enjoying" our one local HD channel on my 20" LCD.
__________________
----------------------------------------------
Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz, 4 Gig DDR2-800, 8.5 TB storage, 8800GTS PCIe, Windows 7 32bit, Hauppauge HD-PVR, Hauppauge HVR-2250, HD-HomeRun, Fusion 5 USB Gold ATSC, SageTV v7.x, HD100, HD200, HD300, 60" Mitsubishi DLP
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-17-2005, 10:56 AM
esubramanian esubramanian is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by White94Cobra
Aren't DLP's typically less expensive than Plasma or LCD? I've been considering a DLP simply because I could get a 55"+ DLP for the price of a 42" Plasma. I'm waiting for the 1080p Samsung DLP to become widely available.

OK... I'm actually waiting for my wife to give in, but it sounds better to say I'm waiting for a new product.

In the mean time I've moved my Fusion 5 card to my main PC, installed MCE 2005, and am "enjoying" our one local HD channel on my 20" LCD.
I recently purchased a 61" Samsung DLP (1080p resolution). I watch it from about 13 feet. HD looks stunning and so does the computer. SD does not look so good when compared to HD, but it is not that bad. The SD is watchable, but if you compare to the 27" CRT that I had before, it does look bad. But, I am pretty sure you can live with it. DVD looks great too.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:47 AM
blade blade is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,500
You guys must be far pickier than I am. I have a 57" hitachi HDTV and SD content doesn't look all that bad on it to me. When I first set it up the picture was awful, but with a lot of tweaking it now looks ok. It looks much better than my old 32" and 52" SDTV's ever did.

Maybe you can find a store that will actually let you view the TV's with a SDTV signal instead of a HDTV so you can see for yourself what to expect?

Last edited by blade; 10-17-2005 at 11:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:52 AM
Kanati's Avatar
Kanati Kanati is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 567
I got my 62" Mitsubishi DLP for 2400... SD is watchable on sage but it's noticably worse than coming directly out of the dish network box. With a plasma it's basically throw-away when it's done... With LCD (rear projection anyway), you replace a bulb every year or two and bang... it's brand new again. It's more maintenance obviously (filter needs replacing or cleaning occasionally too, and the mirrors might still need cleaning every couple of years) but it should last you a good 10-15 years if you need it too. Flat panel LCD's are a bit different... they aren't going to be as "vivid" as a plasma, but they'll probably last longer...

One thing to note about plasmas if you get one... get one that allows you to dim it... Dimming it will increase the life expectancy of the unit greatly.

EDTV... While researching my purchase, I ran into a few EDTV units that had amazing pictures. If I saw it and didn't look close I'd have swore they were HD units. There was even a hitachi (if I remember correctly) that I spent five minutes in the showroom thinking "why the hell is that unit so much cheaper!?" before I actually used my brain and read the tag that said "EDTV".

If you are looking budget but want a better than average picture and are willing to wait for more HD content... EDTV might be worth looking into.

AAAAAaaaaaaand finally... Dish network bought Voom and they have quite a decent HD lineup. It could certainly be better, but they are planning on adding another 10-20 channels late this year or early next year I've been told too...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:55 AM
Kanati's Avatar
Kanati Kanati is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 567
Quote:
I recently purchased a 61" Samsung DLP (1080p resolution).
I was looking at those and decided against it because of the premium price and because they are 1080p capable but right now they just upscale (or deinterlace)... They can't actually accept a 1080p signal (not that there's any 1080p content out there yet any way.)

Can you tell a significant difference between regular 1080i and the deinterlaced 1080p?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-17-2005, 11:59 AM
paulbeers paulbeers is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,550
Whether you buy DLP, Plasma, LCD, or CRT.....


THE BIGGER THE TV, THE WORSE THE SDTV WILL LOOK.


Accept that as fact. We can all agree. Whether you use deinterlacing/interlacing on your vid card, or you hook your dtv right up to the tv, it will not look as nice as your 24" (unless that t.v. was crap to begin with then that is a whole other ball of wax). Buy HD or at least HDTV ready....EDTV as I said before will just leave you pissed off at yourself in a couple years. Two reasons:

1. FCC has now set 2010 as when all broadcast should be in HD (that of course could change like the 2006 deadline)
2. Even if you never watch broadcast/cable HDTV, HD DVD or Blu-Ray DVD is right around the corner and that is in high def format and your EDTV/SDTV will not take advantage.

PLEASE do not throw your money away on an EDTV plasma. Please spend the money and buy at least an HDTV ready television.

If you are just looking for a chepa 27" television or whatever, fine go buy SDTV and upgrade down the line, but if you are going to spend any real money, do it right! Remember this moto:

You get what you pay for.

I have screwed myself toooooooo many times!

Oh and for true expandability I highly recommend an HDMI or DVD port for future expansion.

Sorry the way this post is coming off, I just don't want you to be upset at yourself down the line!
__________________
Sage Server: AMD Athlon II 630, Asrock 785G motherboard, 3GB of RAM, 500GB OS HD in RAID 1 and 2 - 750GB Recording Drives, HDHomerun, Avermedia HD Duet & 2-HDPVRs, and 9.0TB storage in RAID 5 via Dell Perc 5i for DVD storage
Source: Clear QAM and OTA for locals, 2-DishNetwork VIP211's
Clients: 2 Sage HD300's, 2 Sage HD200's, 2 Sage HD100's, 1 MediaMVP, and 1 Placeshifter
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.