SageTV Community  

Go Back   SageTV Community > General Discussion > General Discussion
Forum Rules FAQs Community Downloads Today's Posts Search

Notices

General Discussion General discussion about SageTV and related companies, products, and technologies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #721  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:33 AM
bialio's Avatar
bialio bialio is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 3,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent View Post
IR Blaster setup - I've not done this before so I'll have to do some searching on these forums for this. Is there something special we'll have to do in SageTV to get this to work?
When you install SageTV Server there's an option to enable the Hauppauge IR blaster support (checked by default) - as long as you left that alone when you installed you should be good to go.

btl.
__________________
PHOENIX 3 is here!
Server : Linux V9, Clients : Win10 and Nvidia Shield Android Miniclient
Reply With Quote
  #722  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:36 AM
brb84 brb84 is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 97
Maybe my real noob question is: why do we need component video/optical audio cable at all? Everything is coming into the house on coax (even the digital HD signal), so why exactly can't we just keep using coax once it's inside?

Or is it just a limitation of the STB itself where the cable companies just don't bother sending HD through the coax output? Is this where the DRM comes in possibly?

I'm sorry to bring up what is surely very old discussion, but I'm having a hard to finding this explained well anywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #723  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:41 AM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by brb84 View Post
Maybe my real noob question is: why do we need component video/optical audio cable at all? Everything is coming into the house on coax (even the digital HD signal), so why exactly can't we just keep using coax once it's inside?

Or is it just a limitation of the STB itself where the cable companies just don't bother sending HD through the coax output? Is this where the DRM comes in possibly?

I'm sorry to bring up what is surely very old discussion, but I'm having a hard to finding this explained well anywhere.
It has to do with the encryption cable companies use on their channels. You need an STB to first decode the signal. But then you're stuck using compsite/svid (SD), component or HDMI (HD). Since HDMI is also encrypted the only option is to exploit the analog hole and convert the analog component signal back to digital.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD

Last edited by Taddeusz; 06-02-2008 at 09:41 AM. Reason: fixed
Reply With Quote
  #724  
Old 06-02-2008, 09:48 AM
bialio's Avatar
bialio bialio is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 3,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by brb84 View Post
Maybe my real noob question is: why do we need component video/optical audio cable at all? Everything is coming into the house on coax (even the digital HD signal), so why exactly can't we just keep using coax once it's inside?

Or is it just a limitation of the STB itself where the cable companies just don't bother sending HD through the coax output? Is this where the DRM comes in possibly?

I'm sorry to bring up what is surely very old discussion, but I'm having a hard to finding this explained well anywhere.
Everything comes into the house on the coax. Some of the content is in the clear (unencrypted) - and you don't need anything other than a tuner. Basic cable channels (2 - 99 usually) and some locals in HD are what normally fall into this category.

HOWEVER - most of the "good" stuff (HD, premium channels, etc) is encrypted. The only way to decrypt it is with 1) the cable companies STB or 2) a cable card equipped TV. Sage doesn't and won't ever have support for cable cards, so that leaves us with the STB. It has the following outputs : COAX/Composite/Svideo outputs (analog 480i version of everything), Component (Analog, but in HD (720p or 1080i), and HDMI (Digital, HD).

So we want to capture HD - and the HDMI version is encrypted again! So the only one available to capture is the Component, which the HD-PVR does.

btl.
__________________
PHOENIX 3 is here!
Server : Linux V9, Clients : Win10 and Nvidia Shield Android Miniclient
Reply With Quote
  #725  
Old 06-02-2008, 10:07 AM
brb84 brb84 is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taddeusz View Post
It has to do with the encryption cable companies use on their channels. You need an STB to first decode the signal. But then you're stuck using compsite/svid (SD), component or HDMI (HD). Since HDMI is also encrypted the only option is to exploit the analog hole and convert the analog component signal back to digital.
I think I get it now. The reason you have to use the component or HDMI is simply because the only true digital signal that comes out of a STB is HDMI. The STB puts out analog in the form of component and coax, but with an analog signal, only component cable can bring you an HD picture, not coax.

It seems that what everyone would really want is if the STB also resent digital signal (after the channel was decrypted) through coax for people that had digital tuners, but I guess the DRM people really wouldn't want that...kinda defeats the entire purpose of HDMI being encrypted and all.

I suppose as long as I'm content with being limited to the local clear QAM channels where I don't need a STB, I have no need for this new HD PVR, although it's nice to know it's there if I ever get a STB in the future to get more channels.
Reply With Quote
  #726  
Old 06-02-2008, 10:47 AM
lobosrul's Avatar
lobosrul lobosrul is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taddeusz View Post
Since HDMI is also encrypted the only option is to exploit the analog hole and convert the analog component signal back to digital.
It's actually not encrypted. The box just won't send a signal at all if the device its connected to isn't HDCP compatible (assuming the box has HDCP enabled, and they pretty much all do). Also, signals over HDMI (like component) are uncompressed, so any device taking them needs to compress it somehow or you'll be left with a giant (250-500GB/hr I think recording).
Reply With Quote
  #727  
Old 06-02-2008, 11:00 AM
jrog's Avatar
jrog jrog is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by bialio View Post
I think the TS splitters ANdy posted where for the 6.4.2 beta. IF you are running 6.4.3 you should not need them.

btl.
so, IIRC, and I want to run SageTV Client on my Server and be able to watch the files that come from the HD-PVR, I need TS Splitter, but it is included in the 10.4.3 beta that I loaded up this weekend? Otherwise, I have 3 HD-100 clients that should work fine regardless.

Thanks
__________________
SageTV Server - Q6600, 2GB Ram, 2x 750GB recording, HDHomerun 2xQAM, PVR-USB2, 2x HD-PVR, USB-UIRT controller 2 HD boxes and one SD box

3x HD100 HD Extenders
Reply With Quote
  #728  
Old 06-02-2008, 11:03 AM
Kirby's Avatar
Kirby Kirby is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,253
Quote:
Originally Posted by lobosrul View Post
Also, signals over HDMI (like component) are uncompressed, so any device taking them needs to compress it somehow or you'll be left with a giant (250-500GB/hr I think recording).
I doubt the whole bandwidth is used, but the HDMI 1.3 spec bumped total bandwidth up to just over 10 Gbps! so if my math is right, it could be up to 4.5 terabytes per hour!
__________________
Sage Server: HP ProLiant N40L MicroServer, AMD Turion II Neo N40L 1.5GHz Dual Core, 8GB Ram, WHS2011 64bit, Sage 7.1.9 WHS, HDHR (1 QAM, 1 OTA), HDHR Prime 3CC, HD-PVR for copy-once movie channels
HTPC Client:Intel DH61AG, Intel G620 cpu, 8GB ram, Intel 80GB SSD, 4GB RamDisk holding Sage/Java/TMT5
Sage Client:Sage HD-200 Extender
Reply With Quote
  #729  
Old 06-02-2008, 11:26 AM
btrcp2000 btrcp2000 is offline
Sage Fanatic
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 888
Anybody know if the HDPVR files will play on the mediamvp sd extenders? I would like to use it to record other stuff beyond hd, but not if the resulting files don't play in the kids playroom on a 35-yr old console tv complete with fake wood paneling.
__________________
[size=1]Current Server:V9 UNRAID Docker, SuperMicro x9dri-LNF4+, 32 GB ECC, 2x Xeon e5-2660v2, storage array 6TB, 2 Dish r5000HD tuners, 1 HDHomerun Quatro, 1 HDHomerun Extend
4 Nvidia Shield TVs with Miniclient
Reply With Quote
  #730  
Old 06-02-2008, 11:46 AM
Brent Brent is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: KC, Missouri
Posts: 3,695
Quote:
Originally Posted by btrcp2000 View Post
Anybody know if the HDPVR files will play on the mediamvp sd extenders? I would like to use it to record other stuff beyond hd, but not if the resulting files don't play in the kids playroom on a 35-yr old console tv complete with fake wood paneling.
I'll do some testing, but using the initial video files I've tried (provided by others) I doubt it will work on the MVP unless you have a fairly powerful SageTV server PC since it's transcoding the files for playback.
Reply With Quote
  #731  
Old 06-02-2008, 12:10 PM
dvd_maniac's Avatar
dvd_maniac dvd_maniac is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 1,899
Anybody try splitting/joining these files with mp4box or any other program.
I will buy a few of them as soon as I know I can cut out commercials.
__________________
If this doesn't work right, Then:
"I'm going to blow up the Earth!"
Reply With Quote
  #732  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:23 PM
m1abrams's Avatar
m1abrams m1abrams is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by brb84 View Post

It seems that what everyone would really want is if the STB also resent digital signal (after the channel was decrypted) through coax for people that had digital tuners, but I guess the DRM people really wouldn't want that...kinda defeats the entire purpose of HDMI being encrypted and all.
Actually the idea you have where the STB would just send out the original Cable Signal MINUS the Cables encryption would not really defeat the purpose of HDMI encryption. That encryption is in place so that only proper devices and decode the signal, you would still need an approved QAM tuner to decode it.

Not sure why cable companies do not make a dumbed down STB that just verifies that you are getting what you pay for and strips the encryption then feed the cable to any valid QAM tuner. Maybe because it would make it easier for people to steal the cable, not sure though.
Reply With Quote
  #733  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:33 PM
JimmyHACK JimmyHACK is offline
Sage User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 14
still no CC charge yet... based on order #'s shipped mine should be any second now...
Reply With Quote
  #734  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:42 PM
hemicuda's Avatar
hemicuda hemicuda is offline
Sage Icon
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: north of Chattanooga, Tennessee
Posts: 1,118
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1abrams View Post
Not sure why cable companies do not make a dumbed down STB that just verifies that you are getting what you pay for and strips the encryption then feed the cable to any valid QAM tuner. Maybe because it would make it easier for people to steal the cable, not sure though.
Then they'd lose that rental fee on each box for each drop inside the house. Greedy $%@#$@#$'s.
__________________
Server: MS Win7 SP1; FX8350 (H2O cooled); 8GB RAM; Hauppauge HVR-7164 (OTA); HVR-885 (OTA); SageTV 9.1.5.x; 12+TB Sage Storage

Clients: HD300 x2; HD200 x2; Placeshifter

Service: EPB Fiber (1Gb); OTA (we "cut the cord"); Netflix, Hulu, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #735  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:56 PM
m1abrams's Avatar
m1abrams m1abrams is offline
Sage Aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 445
Quote:
Originally Posted by hemicuda View Post
Then they'd lose that rental fee on each box for each drop inside the house. Greedy $%@#$@#$'s.
I do not know, cause outside of use geeks how many people have more than one STB in the house. I know in my family and friends they only have 1 STB and use analog on the other TVs. They would still charge a fee for the decoding device. My bet is on preventing theft, because in apt. complex type environment you could have one of these boxes feed ALOT of people.
Reply With Quote
  #736  
Old 06-02-2008, 02:11 PM
padre padre is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 128
Got my HD PVR this afternoon, hooked it up and recorded Law & Order via TNT HD. Awesome quality!

I had a problem during the initial install of the Hauppauge drivers (had to reboot the system a few times to get the Hardware Wizard to work correctly).

Tonight I'm going to record a HD show via HDHomeRun (local broadcast) and the same show via HD PVR and compare the results.
Reply With Quote
  #737  
Old 06-02-2008, 02:15 PM
Taddeusz Taddeusz is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1abrams View Post
I do not know, cause outside of use geeks how many people have more than one STB in the house. I know in my family and friends they only have 1 STB and use analog on the other TVs. They would still charge a fee for the decoding device. My bet is on preventing theft, because in apt. complex type environment you could have one of these boxes feed ALOT of people.
My parents have two STB's. One is a DVR in their living room and the other is just a normal SD digital tuner in their bedroom.
__________________
Server: i5 8400, ASUS Prime H370M-Plus/CSM, 16GB RAM, 15TB drive array + 500GB cache, 2 HDHR's, SageTV 9, unRAID 6.6.3
Client 1: HD300 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia 65" 1080p LCD and optical SPDIF to a Sony Receiver
Client 2: HD200 (latest FW), HDMI to an Insignia NS-LCD42HD-09 1080p LCD
Reply With Quote
  #738  
Old 06-02-2008, 02:15 PM
peternm22 peternm22 is offline
Sage Expert
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Can anyone comment on the CPU usage for recording only? (not playback, since I will be using the STX-HD100).

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #739  
Old 06-02-2008, 02:23 PM
Brent Brent is offline
SageTVaholic
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: KC, Missouri
Posts: 3,695
It's arrived! Okay, now that thats out of the way time to get busy setting this thing up. More info coming soon.
Reply With Quote
  #740  
Old 06-02-2008, 02:24 PM
padre padre is offline
Sage Advanced User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by peternm22 View Post
Can anyone comment on the CPU usage for recording only? (not playback, since I will be using the STX-HD100).

Thanks.
I'm just using it for recording (not playback - I'm authoring dvds with the output), and the CPU utilization bumped only 2-4% when I started recording TNT HD channel (1080i source). The system I have is a Dell Dimension E520 (Dual Core 2.80 GHz, 1 GB RAM, 500 GB HDD).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 2003-2005 SageTV, LLC. All rights reserved.